Which Burns More? Water or Steam at 100°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brammo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Steam at 100°C is more likely to cause a serious burn than an equal mass of water at the same temperature due to its ability to release latent heat upon condensation. While steam has a lower heat capacity, it can condense into water, releasing significant energy that increases burn potential. The higher thermal conductivity of water allows it to transfer heat more rapidly to the skin, but steam's energy release upon contact is more critical. The discussion highlights the complexities of comparing heat transfer between steam and water, especially considering practical scenarios of contact. Ultimately, steam's latent heat makes it more dangerous in burn situations.
Brammo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Which is more likely to cause a serious burn, 100^{o}C of water or an equal mass of 100^{o}C of steam.

I was thinking that because the steam has a lower heat capacity it would do less lamage as it has a lesser ability to transfer heat. Or has it got nothing to do with heat capacity? I am a bit confused.

Or is is it to do with the thermal conductivity?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The steam would actually have a higher total heat capacity, since it could condense into 100C water and release energy in the process (and then it would still be water at 100C). I suspect the water will give a more serious burn though, due to the higher thermal conductivity. Even though the steam has more energy, the water will conduct it into the skin of the person touching it much faster.
 
Brilliant thank you.
 
The question is a bit odd as posed. Equal masses of steam and water were assumed, but what's the likelihod that the same mass of steam and water would contact the victim?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top