Which Career Path: Theoretical Physics or Robotics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the choice between pursuing a career in theoretical physics or robotics/engineering, with a focus on the individual's strong interest in math, physics, electronics, and programming. There is a suggestion that studying theoretical physics could provide a solid foundation before transitioning to an experimental field. The conversation acknowledges the ambition of the original poster (OP) to reach the top of their chosen field, emphasizing that such aspirations are common and can drive personal growth and achievement. Overall, the dialogue highlights the importance of aligning educational pursuits with career ambitions in science and technology.
isoics
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I want to become either a theoretical physics or something robotics/engineering related. I've always been into maths and physics and I like electronics and programming as a hobby. I also want the career that gives me space for ambition, since I want to rise to the very top(do I sound naive?).


So which one do you think I should go for?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I guess it advisable to study theoretical physics before starting a career in an experimental field.
Are you studying physics at university? Are you an undergraduate?
 
Soff said:
Are you studying physics at university? Are you an undergraduate?

I'd guess more of a high school level, but don't take my word for it. I'm not the OPer.

and to the OP, you're not alone in wanting to rise to the very top. A self-expectation of grandeur comes standard. Any less and you wouldn't be all that you could be :approve:
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top