Which is larger? the weight or the force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Francis Oliver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between weight and force in physics, particularly when throwing a ball upward. When a ball is thrown, the upward force applied must exceed its weight to create a net acceleration, allowing it to move upward. Once the ball is released, only the force of gravity acts on it, resulting in a downward acceleration. Weight is defined as the gravitational force acting on an object, which remains constant regardless of the net force acting on it. The conversation clarifies that while weight is a constant measure, net force can vary depending on the situation, such as when an object is in motion.
Francis Oliver
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I just started physics about a month ago and I’m having a bit of trouble. It may seem silly but I just have a hard time wrapping my mind around the concept of comparing amount of weight to amount of force.
So anyway my question is while you throw a ball upward, which is larger: the weight of the ball or your upward force on the ball?
Thank you very much for any assistance you can offer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The total force on the ball is its weight (mg) plus any other force on it. When the ball is in your hand as you throw it up, you apply an upward force greater than mg so that there is a net acceleration, giving it an upward velocity. As soon as you let go, the only force acting on it is gravity (ignoring air resistance, which just acts to slow it down whatever direction its going). The net force is down, and the ball accelerates downward until it loses its upward velocity and begins to fall back down to earth.
 
Also, to clarify the weight of an object is a measure of the force of gravity acting on it.

A 1lb object has mass 0.45kg

The force of gravity on a 0.45 kg is 0.45*9.8 = 4.45N

So you get the conversion factor for the force of gravity,

1lb = 4.45N (only on Earth).

An object always WEIGHS the same (again, on Earth) but the net FORCE acting on it is independant of that. For example, if I'm holding a 1lb object in my hand the net force on it is zero, however it doesn't weigh 0 lbs, it weighs 1lb.

Cool?
 
I think perhaps whozum did not mean independant in the sense that the weight has no bearing on the net force. For if this were the case, his arm would require 0 force to hold the mass in the air.

I preume he meant that the net force of an object is not solely determined by the weight of an object. In your example, the ball is moving upwards, therefore the upwards force is greater, as it is OVERCOMING the gravitational force pulling the object down

-NewScientist
 
If you are simply holding the ball, at rest, the force you are applying to the ball is equal to the weight of the ball. Throwing it upward, you are giving the ball an acceleration so the force must be greater than the weight of the ball.
 
Thank you HallsOfIvy for expressing my idea far better than I could!

-NewScientist
 
NewScientist said:
Thank you HallsOfIvy for expressing my idea far better than I could!

-NewScientist
No, I'm just "simpler" than you are!
 
Back
Top