Which lab equipment should we use to mix a thick solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thondyl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equipment Lab
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting appropriate lab equipment for mixing a thick solution of organic matter with a volatile solvent. Participants explore various equipment options, their effectiveness, and potential alternatives, while addressing challenges related to the mixing process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions the inefficacy of a magnetic stirrer due to the thickness of the organic matter, causing the stirring rod to malfunction.
  • Another participant suggests that an overhead stirrer is limited by the need to keep the container closed to prevent solvent evaporation.
  • An orbital shaker is noted as the best option tried so far, but it still fails to effectively mix the heavy organic matter.
  • A blender is proposed but concerns are raised about its durability and noise level for long-term use.
  • Some participants propose Soxhlet extraction as a potential solution, although there is confusion about its relevance to the mixing requirement.
  • One participant suggests using a tube rotator or mixing rotator, but others express concerns about the size limitations for their 1L flask.
  • A baffled flask is recommended to improve mixing efficiency during orbital shaking, with some participants expressing interest in this idea.
  • A bottle roller machine is identified as a suitable option, but the high cost raises concerns among participants.
  • Suggestions for alternative sources or DIY solutions for bottle rollers and rock tumblers are discussed, with some participants finding affordable options.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best equipment to use, with no consensus reached on a single solution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective method for mixing the thick solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the sensitivity of the solution to heat and the challenges posed by the physical properties of the organic matter, which may affect the effectiveness of various mixing methods.

Thondyl
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all!

We're trying to dissolve a mixture of organic matter with a solvent that is highly volatile. Currently, we have to shake the solution very frequently to ensure the organic matter doesn't settle down on the bottom of the flask.

However, it takes a REALLY long time for the organic matter to completely dissolve and we think we could greatly speed up the process if we can use an equipment that automates the shaking.

The following is a list of equipment that we have tried/thought about but all of them had some problems:

Magnetic stirrer - The organic matter is too thick for the rods to spin properly. The rod quickly moves out of position and spins out of control.

Overhead stirrer - The container must be closed -- the solvent evaporates too quickly and the reaction takes several days to complete.

Orbital shaker - The best option so far but still not very effective. The organic matter is heavy so it settles down on the bottom and isn't really affected by the shaker.

Blender - We haven't tried this but we are afraid the blender might fail since it isn't designed to operate 24 hours for several days at a time. Also, the speed is too great and its also really noisy to leave in the lab.

Any ideas/recommendations on which equipment we should use will be greatly appreciated!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Soxhlet extraction?
 
Bystander said:
Soxhlet extraction?

Sorry but could you clarify what you meant? I don' think that's what we're trying to achieve.

We just need an equipment that will mix the solution for an extended period of time.
 
You're wanting solvent in contact with undissolved material for days without the noise of a shaker (paint cans), or risking mechanical failures; Soxhlet extraction will put hot solvent over undissolved material, leave filtered solution in the boiler, and given an efficient condenser, can be left for days.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
In what sort of container are you performing the reaction? You may want to consider something like a tube rotator or mixing rotator that will rotate tubes end-over-end (e.g. see http://www.lab-kits.com/image/data/mixer/lab_mixer.jpg or http://europe.labnetinternational.c...roduct-images/Revolver_360_Sample_Mixer_2.png).

We thought of that but it is too small. The solution is in a 1L erlenmeyer flask and it would be really tedious to pour the solution into each test tube.
Bystander said:
You're wanting solvent in contact with undissolved material for days without the noise of a shaker (paint cans), or risking mechanical failures; Soxhlet extraction will put hot solvent over undissolved material, leave filtered solution in the boiler, and given an efficient condenser, can be left for days.

The solution extremely sensitive to heat so I don't think that'll work.
 
Last edited:
Heat sensitive slow dissolving gunk ... Have you tried the short bars with the magnetic stirrer?
 
We did. The bar had a hard time spinning and couldn't stay on the center for very long. The volume is also too great for it to effectively stir even if it did work perfectly.
 
If orbital shaking seemed most effective, you may want to consider using a baffled flask. These have indentations on the bottom that help to distrub the fluid shaking around in the bottom of the flask. Biologists use these flasks to better aerate microbial cultures, but in your case, it may help mix your solution better than shaking in a standard flask.
 
  • #10
Ygggdrasil said:
If orbital shaking seemed most effective, you may want to consider using a baffled flask. These have indentations on the bottom that help to distrub the fluid shaking around in the bottom of the flask. Biologists use these flasks to better aerate microbial cultures, but in your case, it may help mix your solution better than shaking in a standard flask.

Thank you! We'll look into it.
 
  • #11
After searching for a while, we found that a bottle roller machine would be perfect for our project: http://static.coleparmer.com/large_images/3620202.jpg

However, when we contacted the manufacturer they told it is going to cost us around $2000!

Why does it cost so much?? $2000 is way too much for an equipment that simply just rotates the bottle around.

Does anyone know where we could purchase this (or a similar) machine for a lower price? Its fine if we have to DIY or do some simple modifications.
 
  • #12
Cole-Parmer is the Ford/Chevrolet of laboratory equipment manufacturers/dealers and cheap as you're going to find from that sector. You might try looking in Edmund for lapidary equipment that rolls small jars for rock polishing.
 
  • #13
Bystander said:
Cole-Parmer is the Ford/Chevrolet of laboratory equipment manufacturers/dealers and cheap as you're going to find from that sector. You might try looking in Edmund for lapidary equipment that rolls small jars for rock polishing.

Thanks! We found a couple of bottle rollers at Cole-Parmer's website but they start at $1100 which is still a little too expensive for us. However, the rock tumbler is PERFECT for our needs and the price is affordable too.
 
  • #14
You will find a lot of DIY projects on the web with rock tumblers that cost just a few bucks ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K