Which Monosaccharides are Indigestible to Humans?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the digestibility of monosaccharides by humans, specifically questioning which monosaccharides cannot be metabolized. It highlights that while lactose-intolerant individuals struggle with lactose and cellulose is indigestible due to its polymer structure, the focus is on monosaccharides. It is noted that all naturally occurring monosaccharides in food can be metabolized, as they can be converted into energy through glycolysis. However, synthetic monosaccharides may exist that humans cannot digest due to a lack of necessary enzymes. The conversation also touches on the structural characteristics that might render a monosaccharide un-metabolizable, suggesting that recognition by body enzymes is crucial for digestion.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
For example, lactose-intolerant humans cannot process/digest lactose.
Neither can we digest cellulose.

--------------------------------------
But for the most "tolerant" humans,
are there certain monosaccharides that humans cannot digest?

*What monosaccharides are inedible to humans?
(and not just for those who are lactose-intolerant)
:redface:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
They are still edible, but just not metabolizable. Cellulose is a polymer.
 
quasi426 said:
They are still edible, but just not metabolizable. Cellulose is a polymer.

Yes, I know, cellulose (a polysaccharide) is a polymer of glucose :rolleyes:

But my question is:

What monosaccharides cannot be metabolized by humans?

Not considering special "-intolerant" types, which monosaccharides simply cannot be metabolized by humans?
:blusing: Even among the most *tolerant* types?
 
Last edited:
Any monosaccharide that can be converted so it can fit into glycolysis can be metabolized. None of the monosaccharides naturally found in food are un-metabolizable. If we can break down the polysaccharide, we can find a way of converting all the monosaccharides into energy (although sometimes more and sometimes less than glucose). There probably are monosaccharides you can make in a lab that we can't digest because we don't have the enzymes to convert them into something usable.
 
does it have anything to do with L or D structure?the one that cannot be metabolised are the one that are not recognised by the normal body enzymes (or due to lack of that enzyme)...and since they're specific for one kind of structure...correct me if I'm wrong!
 
By the way,

*What features would an un-metabolizable monosaccharide possess?

*What (structural) characteristics might cause a monosachharide to be un-metabolizable?

:smile:
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top