Which Object Travels Further: Mass or Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathewsaji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Velocity
AI Thread Summary
When two objects of different masses are propelled upwards at the same velocity, the distance they travel is primarily influenced by gravitational forces rather than mass. In a vacuum, both objects would reach the same height due to gravity acting equally on them, regardless of their mass. However, in the presence of air resistance, the object with less mass may experience a greater deceleration, potentially affecting its ascent. The discussion invites consideration of scenarios with and without air, emphasizing the role of gravity as highlighted by Galileo Galilei. Ultimately, the question revolves around understanding the effects of mass and external forces on motion.
Mathewsaji
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello friends,
When two objects with different mass is propelled with same velocity, straight upwards into air, which object would travel more. The one with less mass or more??

Hope you guys would sure post your comments
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tell us what you think, first. :smile:
 
Mathewsaji said:
Hello friends,
When two objects with different mass is propelled with same velocity, straight upwards into air, which object would travel more. The one with less mass or more??


What do you think and why?
You might try imagining that you have a motion picture of the two masses leaving the ground at the same time and at the same speed and climbing to their peak heights - what would it look like if you played it backwards?
 
And also decide if you want to imagine a scenario where there is air or where there is only gravity. How do you think that would change things, if at all?
 
Hint: Galileo Galilei
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Question about a Rotating system with mass moving inwards
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Question about Momentum vs. Kinetic Energy vs. Deforming In Collisions
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K
I A specific case of an exception to Archimedes' Principle?
Replies
40
Views
4K
Terminal velocity of two balls with different masses
Replies
22
Views
22K
Car in corner -- relative airflow
Replies
20
Views
3K
Testing Newtonian Gravity: Collision of Two Masses
Replies
17
Views
2K
Angular and linear velocity question
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Decoupling of a spring mass system
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top