Which solutions of GR are experimentally tested

  • Thread starter Thread starter smallphi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
smallphi
Messages
436
Reaction score
2
I think we have tested experimentally only Minkowski (Special Relativity) and Schwarzschield (Solar system tests) solutions of GR.

Am I missing anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smallphi said:
I think we have tested experimentally only Minkowski (Special Relativity) and Schwarzschield (Solar system tests) solutions of GR.

Am I missing anything?

Spiraling binaries.
 
smallphi said:
I think we have tested experimentally only Minkowski (Special Relativity) and Schwarzschield (Solar system tests) solutions of GR.

Am I missing anything?

http://einstein.stanford.edu/" goes beyond Schwarzschild.

See, also, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=173870".

Technical work on Enhanced Ligo, which will boost sensitivity by a factor of 2, should start now/soon, and then another data-taking run will be made. After this, work on Advanced Ligo should start in 2010, with data-taking starting in 2014. Advanced LIGO should be 10 times more sensitive than initial LIGO, and if it doesn't see anything, then theory might be in trouble.

See the Prospects section from conference proceeding #52, P070079-01, from http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/ppcomm/Papers.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you accept astronomical, especially cosmological, observations as tests, you can add FRW (Friedmann-Robertson-Walker) exact solutions to Minkowski, Schwarzschild and Kerr("rotating Schwarzschild") as exact solutions that have been at least slightly tested.

Jim Graber
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
118
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
924
Back
Top