Which Statement About Electrolysis is True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter itsonlyme90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Electrolysis involves the flow of electrons from the cathode to the anode through an external circuit. Electricity is conducted through the electrolyte during the process of electrolysis. The ease of discharge of metallic cations is inversely proportional to the metal's reactivity. Additionally, the amount of substance produced during electrolysis is directly proportional to the electric current and the charge on the ion. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping electrolysis.
itsonlyme90
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey ya..i am new here..erm..setting up this thread to seek help from the pros here..erm..do feel free to post ur ans..

to start off..here is my first qn..
Which of the following is true regarding electrolysis?
A.electrons flow from the cathode to the anode through the external circuit.
B.electricity is conducted through the electrolyte through electrolysis.
C. the ease of discharge of metallic cation is inversely proportional to the reactivity of metal.
D.the amount of substance produced during electrolysis is directly proportional to the amount of electric current and the charge on the ion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Surely you know something? Show us what.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Can liquid conductors be used to improve the efficiency of electric motors?
Replies
4
Views
4K
Exploring Conductive Liquids and Superconductors: Questions and Possibilities
Replies
2
Views
1K
Can you make an electrophoresis battery?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why is engineering the toughest major (for me)?
Replies
19
Views
2K
How Does Li-ion Battery Chemistry Work?
Replies
1
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top