Which Voice Reaches Further: Low Bass or High Soprano?

  • Thread starter Thread starter music_lover12
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Higher pitched sounds, like a high soprano voice, are generally more attention-getting and may be heard better in environments with obstacles. This is attributed to their shorter wavelengths, which allow them to disperse more effectively around corners. Conversely, low bass sounds, while they can travel further and penetrate deeper materials, may not be as easily noticed in everyday situations. In seismology, low-frequency waves are known to attenuate less and travel faster, demonstrating their ability to cover long distances. Overall, while low frequencies have advantages in certain contexts, high frequencies are often more perceptible in typical auditory scenarios.
music_lover12
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Let's say that you're waking down a hallway heading toward your next class, and somebody inside calls to you from the room--one has a low bss voice and another has a high soprano voice. They both call to you with the same volume. Which one would you be able to hear better?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Higher pitched sounds tend to be more attention-getting to humans. I have a hunch that they also take corners better because of the shorter wavelength, and thus disperse better throughout a building, but I don't know for sure.
From personal experience, I know that I would hear the high-pitched one better.
 
Agreed, although in seismology low frequency waves attenuate less quickly and also tend to travel faster because they sample deeper (and faster) Earth material.
 
Oh, I certainly agree that bass or even infra-sonic frequencies carry far better. Hence whalesongs being detectable half-way around the planet, or earthquakes showing up all the way on the other side.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top