Who are the potential candidates for the 2006 Abel Prize?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Potential candidates for the 2006 Abel Prize are debated, with suggestions leaning towards both established mathematicians and younger researchers. The discussion highlights a desire for the prize to maintain its reputation by honoring significant contributions to mathematics. Some participants argue that the prize should not compete with the Fields Medal, as both serve different purposes in recognizing mathematical achievement. The conversation also touches on the socioeconomic challenges faced by mathematicians, emphasizing the need for fair compensation in the field. Ultimately, the selection criteria for the Abel Prize should reflect a balance between honoring past achievements and encouraging emerging talent.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
who do you think are respectable candidates for this year?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since the Abel prize is relatively new, and the committe behind it wishes to establish a high, sought-after reputation, I expect that the trend from the last awards will continue:

Find a hoary, old mathematician whose achievements are indisputable and who is deserving of a few extra millions.
 
well, i believe that the poor are in need for the extra millions and not some old mathematical geezer.
but that's my opinion, although be it radical.
 
loop quantum gravity said:
well, i believe that the poor are in need for the extra millions and not some old mathematical geezer.
but that's my opinion, although be it radical.
:smile:

I (almost) agree with you..
 
I think they should look at the young guns.
 
JasonRox said:
I think they should look at the young guns.
Why should the Abel Prize try to compete with the Fields medal?

There's more than enough room for two prizes in math targeting slightly different groups.
 
loop quantum gravity said:
well, i believe that the poor are in need for the extra millions and not some old mathematical geezer.
but that's my opinion, although be it radical.
*sigh* mathematicians are poor too! They deserve to have a lot more than they do.o:)
 
JasonRox said:
I think they should look at the young guns.

One is dedicated to young(ish) researchers who produce a 'few' results of exceptional quality, ie they answer something big.

The Abel prize rewards those who have influenced the field of mathematics through a career of distinguished research. JP Serre and Atiyah/Singer got the first two I seem to recall.

It seems quite reasonable to make this distinction.
 
matt, you can look at mathdaily.com, in order to relook of abel lauretees (i think this is how you write (-: ).

and lisa, it depends, if the mathematician has good social connections with fellow mathematicians then he will get a steady (upper class) income, but if his social skills are poor then so his success. (look at history and see what i mean, or otherwise search at mactutor for a biography for some poor mathematician).

anyway, you need to pick correctly who are your mates & foes.
 
Back
Top