- #71
Eric England
- 115
- 0
-Job- said:The individual will always report nothing as something that is identifiable and thus, in the individual's interpretation, MUST EXIST.
In this thread and the other, you are still misrepresenting what I've said and are indirectly making my point.
I have clearly stated that nothing (in it's absolute sense), DOES NOT exist. It is NOT a something.
If absolutely nothing does not exist, then something absolute does. This is what we commonly refer to as God.
If absolutely nothing does exist, as you mistakenly quote me as saying, then God doesn't exist, we don't exist, etc.
To drag a point over here from the other thread, there are three types of nothing. The nonexistent absolute nothing. The relatively absolute nothing, which is the partner of the relatively absolute everything. And relatively nothing, which is the partner of something relative.
Everything & nothing are the state of potential outside (before) the universe. The so-called boundary. Something relative & relatively nothing are the state of potential of an infinite universe. The universe without a so-called boundary.
Absoulutely nothing does not exist... God does.