Who First Described Wave Propagation Through Medium Disturbance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haibane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the principle that describes wave propagation through medium disturbance. The original poster is unsure if the correct answer is Huygens' Principle, as it relates to the idea of waves radiating from vibrating points in a medium. They express confusion over whether this principle adequately explains the behavior of waves, particularly regarding the absence of backward waves. Another participant confirms that Huygens' Principle is indeed the correct answer, while also mentioning potential paradoxes associated with it. The conversation highlights the complexities of wave theory and the importance of precise terminology in physics.
Haibane
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Was performing the online "reading questions" for my Physics 2 course. And I came to this question.

"A wave is not a material thing but a disturbance moving through a medium. The way that it propagates is that every part of the medium it encounters begins to vibrate in time with the wave and therefore with the original cause of the disturbance. Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions. This idea is known as:"

Now after reading through the chapter a few times, I've not been able to see the mention of any laws, or statements that really seem to match this.

Any idea on where I may find such information?



Homework Equations


Possible choices in this case.

Newton's conjecture
Einstein's hypothesis
Hyghen's principle
Maxwell's proposal
Faraday's paradox



The Attempt at a Solution



If I recall correctly. Einsteins hypothesis referred to the idea of the moving of electric, and magnetic fields in parralel. While Faraday's Paradox has to do with magnetism.

I'm thinking it may be Hyghen's principle as it refers to the idea of light radiating in all directions. But at least as read, it doesn't make any mention about the part which might refer to the idea of the object vibrating in synch and thus appearing to become the source of the waves being emitted.


Can I get some help with this, or at least be pointed in the right direction?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is indeed Huygens' Principle. The last sentence, viz., "Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions," should convince you.
 
Okey, I thought so as I was thinking about it. But wanted to make sure I was not incorrect in this. Since every point counts in the class, hehe.

Thank you for your help :)
 
Last edited:
Unexplained contradiction/paradox?

Long ago I somewhere read, that Huygens principle implied an unexplained
contradiction: Obviously no part of the newborn sum of concentric waves
at wavefront go backwards toward original source. There are no "backward waves", as should be if Huygens principle was really true. :confused:

There are also some other "paradoxes" concerning wave propagation - but life becomes easier if not bothering this too much. Mostly issues for future
Nobel Prize winners to dwell into ? :cool:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top