History Who is William of Ockham and why is he important in the history of philosophy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
William of Ockham is recognized as a pivotal figure in scholastic thought, comparable to Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus, particularly following the revival of interest in late medieval philosophy in the late 20th century. His contributions to terminist logic, linguistic theory, and semiotics have made him a significant reference point in contemporary philosophical discussions. Ockham's ideas have influenced the understanding of Aristotle's work through the medieval period, as explored in literature such as "Aristotle's Children." His philosophical legacy highlights the foundational role of medieval thinkers in shaping modern thought. Ockham's enduring relevance underscores the importance of historical philosophy in contemporary discourse.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Ockham.html

... with the revival of interest in late medieval thought that took place in the second half of the twentieth century, Ockham has re-emerged as one of the major figures of scholastic thought, generally ranked on the level of Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus. And from the standpoint of the philosophy of the 1980s and 1990s, Ockham's interest in terminist logic, linguistic theory, and semiotics has placed him in the forefront of those medieval thinkers used as sources in contemporary philosophical discussion.

Often quoted but how many know his story ?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
There's a good book on the medieval thinkers called Aristotle's Children. It takes the growing medieval understanding and critical thought about Aristotle through the generations. Okham and my own fave, Buridan are well described.
 
selfAdjoint said:
There's a good book on the medieval thinkers called Aristotle's Children. It takes the growing medieval understanding and critical thought about Aristotle through the generations. Okham and my own fave, Buridan are well described.

It is a sort of eye opener that that people far back in time sewed the seeds
of what we know today, Self Adjoint, i wonder how many would have to be
included ?
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top