Who or What is the Source of Work in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyouran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
In physics, work is defined as being done by a force, which can originate from various sources such as an object or a field. In the example of a man pushing a box, the force exerted by the man does positive work on the box, transferring energy to it. Conversely, the box exerts an equal but opposite force on the man, resulting in negative work for him. This illustrates that work can be attributed to different bodies depending on the perspective taken. Ultimately, the source of work is linked to the force and its origin, emphasizing the importance of context in understanding energy transfer.
Kyouran
Messages
70
Reaction score
10
In physics, work is said to be done by a force. In the field of electricity, work is done by an electrical field. In thermodynamics, work is done by a system. This is kind of confusing and makes me wonder, what is actually the thing that does work? Is it the object, the force field or the force itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kyouran,
that is a good question. As you wrote, the work is always done by a force. This force always has its origin in some other body:Imagine man pushing a box on ground from right to left.


BOX MAN
--> <--
-F .. F
<--BOX...


The force acting on the box is \mathbf{F}, the force on the man is -\mathbf{F}.

Because these are two distinct forces, the have two distinct works.

1) The work of the force acting on the box

When the box has moved to the left by displacement \mathbf{s}, the force \mathbf{F} has performed work

$$
W_1 = \mathbf F\cdot \mathbf s
$$

Since the force originates in the man, it is also often said that the man has done the work. In our case it is positive; this means the box has acquired equivalent energy and man has lost it.

2) The work of the force -\mathbf F acting on the man is

$$
W_2 = (-\mathbf F)\cdot \mathbf s
$$

This is negative of the above work. Since the force originates in the box, we can equally say this work has been done by the box.We can choose anyone of the two above alternatives to describe the energy transfer; but only one at a time. Usually we choose that which has positive work, here it is 1).

So, when we say body A (a man) is doing work on body B (a box), we actually mean that there is a force due to body A that has some positive component along the velocity of the body B.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top