Who scored the first ODI double century against South Africa today?

  • Thread starter Thread starter George Jones
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Sachin Tendulkar made history by scoring the first double century in One Day Internationals (ODIs) against South Africa, a significant achievement given the team's strong ranking. The match showcased Tendulkar's exceptional batting skills, as he reached 200 runs in a format where high scores are challenging due to limited overs and the need to avoid getting out. The discussion highlights the unique conditions of Indian cricket grounds, which are smaller and have fast outfields, potentially contributing to higher scoring rates. Tendulkar's accomplishment is celebrated among cricket enthusiasts, with some humorously likening cricket fandom to a religion, where Tendulkar is revered as a deity. The conversation also touches on the broader context of cricket statistics and the historical significance of this milestone in the sport.
George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,643
Reaction score
1,601
Against South Africa today, Tendulkar scored the first ODI double century.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Geez! I saw he was 124 n.o after 33 overs and though SA might be in a bit of trouble! Mind you, I'm not sure 200 on the small, lightning fast Indian outfields would be 200 anywhere else. In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!
 
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
 
If Cricket is a religion then Sachin is God and i am his ardent devotee :)
 
Jack21222 said:
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.

That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training/prep_for_double_centuries.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
matt.o said:
Geez! I saw he was 124 n.o after 33 overs and though SA might be in a bit of trouble! Mind you, I'm not sure 200 on the small, lightning fast Indian outfields would be 200 anywhere else.
The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).

http://stats.cricinfo.com/indvpak/e...nnings_totals.html?class=2;id=758;type=ground

And it's certainly not like he did it against an easy team either - SA is ranked #3 in the ODI rankings.

http://www.cricinfo.com/rankings/content/current/page/211271.html
 
Last edited:
hamster143 said:
That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training/prep_for_double_centuries.html
:smile:

Wait, were you being serious? We do need that sarcasm/irony smiley.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hamster143 said:
That basically means that someone named Tendulkar rode 200 miles non stop in a bicycle race. Not an easy task. Most humans only have enough energy stored in their muscles and liver to survive 50 to 75 miles. Beyond that, you have to rely on supplemental energy, maybe by eating an energy bar every 15 minutes.

http://www.ultracycling.com/training/prep_for_double_centuries.html

No, you missed the Odie part. It goes like this.

http://i-love-disney.com/disney-gallery/albums/Cartoons/Garfield/Animations/Odie/thumb_Odie1.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jack21222 said:
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.
The game is cricket. Here's a quickie intro:



No one in the game of cricket (specifically in the One-Day format), had, until yesterday, accomplished the feat of scoring 200 runs in a single match. What makes this difficult is that, in addition to having to last long enough without getting "out", you have a limited number of balls to face. Sachin Tendulkar - who broke the record yesterday - is considered by many cricket experts to be the best batter (or batsman) the game has today, and easily among the best of all time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Jack21222 said:
In English, please? I'm too lazy to start googling terms, but I'm interested enough to want to know more aobut this accomplishment.

I thought that is already too English. Did you mean American?
 
  • #11
Gokul43201 said:
The previous high score for a team batting at Gwalior was 289 (by Pak, vs SL in 1997).

http://stats.cricinfo.com/indvpak/e...nnings_totals.html?class=2;id=758;type=ground

That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=team_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"

or given Tendulkar brought up his 200 in the last over, perhaps we should look at the above, but sorted by average run-rate:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=runs_per_over;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"

Given the above, I will stand by my statement! (which included "In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!")

Amar.alchemy said:
If Cricket is a religion then Sachin is God and i am his ardent devotee :)

Yes, but this would have to be a polytheist religion which included the great Sir Donald Bradman!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
matt.o said:
That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=team_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"

or given Tendulkar brought up his 200 in the last over, perhaps we should look at the above, but sorted by average run-rate:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=runs_per_over;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"

Given the above, I will stand by my statement! (which included "In any case, it's a mean feat, so well done to the Little Master!")
Agreed! Those are better ways to look at the stats.

Yes, but this would have to be a polytheist religion which included the great Sir Donald Bradman!
Few would disagree with that. And speaking of Bradman ... http://www.cricinfo.com/india/content/story/96323.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
matt.o said:
That's not a particularly good statistic to test my hypothesis, especially given the low number of games played at Gwalior. Perhaps a better way to look at this is by comparing the batting averages on a ground-by-ground basis for grounds where there have been > 10 ODIs:

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;orderby=team_average;qualmin1=10;qualval1=matches;template=results;type=aggregate;view=ground"

From the URL above, it looks like Indian grounds are in general favor of batsmen. Is it due to smaller ground, fast rolling ground or slow pitch?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
 
  • #15
Doug Huffman said:
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.
In English, please?
 
  • #16
Doug Huffman said:
In re cycling 'double century', 200 km or 120 miles is the shortest of the brevets to qualify for Paris-Brest-Paris or Boston-Montreal-Boston, 1200 km in 90 hours. Brevet, Audax or Randonee.

That is more properly called 'double metric century'.
 
  • #17
jobyts said:
From the URL above, it looks like Indian grounds are in general favor of batsmen. Is it due to smaller ground, fast rolling ground or slow pitch?

Slow pitches aren't generally conducive to scoring quickly. The grounds in India are small and have fast outfields, which I think is the dominant factor in the faster scoring rates and larger batting averages/inning totals..
 
  • #18
Man, its all anyone here can talk about these days. The worst part is that I don't really follow cricket and never really have.
 
Back
Top