Why 1 degree corresponds to 60 min?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ftnunosilva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
AI Thread Summary
One degree corresponds to 60 minutes of arc, which is a measure of angle, not time. This distinction clarifies that the "minute" in this context is different from the minute used in hours. The division of degrees into 60 minutes is rooted in historical systems, particularly those of the Sumerians and Babylonians, who favored the number 60 for its divisibility. The use of 12 and 60 in various measurements reflects historical practices rather than logical reasoning. Understanding these historical contexts helps clarify why these systems were developed.
ftnunosilva
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a doubt: considering it takes 24h to a complete rotation of earth, why 1º corresponds to 60 min? It should be 4 min...

Can you help me?

Thanks you

Nuno Silva
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So, this "minute" isn't the 1/60 of a hour?
 
ftnunosilva said:
So, this "minute" isn't the 1/60 of a hour?
No.

Don't confuse minutes of arc (a measure of angle) with minutes of time.

1 degree = 60 minutes of arc.
 
Thank you very much... After reading Around the World in Eighty Days, I became all mixed up! :-)
 
These things are not based upon logic, so much as history. Even to very recent times, the English used 12 pence to a shilling, 20 shillings to a pound. This complicates arithmetic, of course, but bookkeepers easily mastered it.

A reason for 60, like 12, is that it is easily divisible. So that in early times, it was used to facilitate making change and dividing up products. (Farmers, even in this country, favor the 12 makes a dozen eggs.) The Sumerians, and then the Babylonians, used the 60 system, but for hours it was 12 in the day and 12 at night. (This is not exactly the same as the 24 hour system, since some days are longer than others.) Where the Sumerians got the idea of 12 hours of daylight, is really hard to say.

I once hear a joke, "How many fingers do the flying saucer people have counting both hands?"

Answer: 10, we just don't know what base they use.

However, that idea, the universality of 10, hardly explains the 12 and 60 system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top