Why 10^520 Universes in String Theory Landscape

Quantizer
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the connection between eternal inflation and the the string theory landscape of 10^520 possible universes

Where is the original scientific article that proposed so many false vacua solutions

If anyone can point me to the underlying equation and article that articulates there are up to 10^520 possible universes that would be very much appreciated

Btw, I have just joined Physics Forums, searched high and low in google and in these forums but cannot find any definitive answers documented concisely anywhere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wrote this before so you can probably use some key words below to find relevant references. I have actually written a layman version. Bapowell already gave you the hint.
andrien said:
It has to do with the size and shape of the calabi-Yau manifold with the help of which the compactification is done. you need something extra to avoid the moduli problem for which you need fluxes, which somehow give it a definite size and it will now take energy to change the shape of the manifold. These fluxes are somekind of threading lines through the holes of the manifolds. A calabi-yau in 6 dimensions has around 500 holes,and fluxes themselves are quantized (say take value from 0 to 9) which gives around ##10^{500}## possibilities. Each one of which corresponds to different vacuum, one of which is ours corresponding to almost zero cosmological constant.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Back
Top