Why a D-D reaction in the Divertor Tokamak Test Facility?

AI Thread Summary
The DTT project proposal focuses on a D-D reaction for the future tokamak in Frascati, Italy, due to its smaller cross section and less energetic neutrons compared to the D-T reaction. This choice impacts heat and particle exhaust on the divertor, as the divertor primarily experiences ion impacts from the plasma, with neutrons playing a minor role. The heat flux on the divertor is expected to change due to these factors, influencing its design and operation. Tritium presents operational challenges, making deuterium a more manageable option for the facility. Overall, the DTT will not engage in significant fusion activities.
Giuliavaleria
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The DTT project proposal talks about a D-D reaction inside the future tokamak that is going to be built in Italy, Frascati. Which is the reason of this choise? The cross section is smaller than the D-T reaction one, and neutrons are less energetic. How this influences heat and particle exhaust on the divertor? and how does the heat flux changes?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is a divertor test facility. The divertor is mainly hit by ions from the plasma. While it is also hit by some neutrons that plays a smaller role. The DTT won't have any relevant fusion as far as I understand.

Tritium is more difficult to work with, unless there is a strong reason to do so operation with deuterium is easier.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Back
Top