- #1

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Frigus
- Start date

- #1

- #2

- 18,141

- 10,969

Is this a homework problem?

- #3

Frigus

- 337

- 157

No sir.Is this a homework problem?

- #4

- 18,141

- 10,969

- #5

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir force is applied continuously perpendicular to the velocity as in case we rotates a stone using string and sorry I missed showing the force in my picture.

- #6

Bandersnatch

Science Advisor

- 3,326

- 2,629

For a change in direction only (as with e.g. circular motion) the acceleration vector must remain perpendicular to velocity at all times.

- #7

- 10,075

- 10,636

- #8

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir can you please tell me from where can I get this proof.

- #9

- 23,748

- 15,359

Someone else had the same question recently:Sir can you please tell me from where can I get this proof.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/a-proof-that-magnetic-forces-do-no-work.981895/

- #10

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir I can't figure it from that thread can you please give me an proof of this.

- #11

- 23,748

- 15,359

Sir I can't figure it from that thread can you please give me an proof of this.

Let ##K = \frac 1 2 m v^2 = \frac 1 2 m \vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}## be the kinetic energy of a particle. $$\frac{dK}{dt} = \frac 1 2 m \frac{d}{dt}(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}) = m (\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt} \cdot \vec{v}) = m\vec{a} \cdot \vec v = \vec F \cdot \vec v$$

Hence, if the force is perpendicular to the velocity, then ##\frac{dK}{dt} = 0##, which means the kinetic energy of the particle is constant, hence the speed is constant.

- #12

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir but in this derivation we have used the result of derivation"which proves that perpendicular force cannot change the magnitude of velocity" which is my question?Let ##K = \frac 1 2 m v^2 = \frac 1 2 m \vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}## be the kinetic energy of a particle. $$\frac{dK}{dt} = \frac 1 2 m \frac{d}{dt}(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}) = m (\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt} \cdot \vec{v}) = m\vec{a} \cdot \vec v = \vec F \cdot \vec v$$

Hence, if the force is perpendicular to the velocity, then ##\frac{dK}{dt} = 0##, which means the kinetic energy of the particle is constant, hence the speed is constant.

Sorry to argue sir.

- #13

- 23,748

- 15,359

Sir but in this derivation we have used the result of derivation"which proves that perpendicular force cannot change the magnitude of velocity" which is my question?

Sorry to argue sir.

Not at all. $$\vec F \cdot \vec v = 0 \ \Rightarrow \frac{dK}{dt} = 0 \ \Rightarrow \frac{dv}{dt} = 0$$

PS Note that in post #11 I showed that: $$\frac{dK}{dt} = \vec F \cdot \vec v$$

- #14

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

Whenever I see students with this misconception, they always look at the situation evolving forward in time. That is, they look at the velocity vector now, apply the [assumed to be] constant acceleration and derive that the velocity vector later has increased in magnitude. From this they conclude that speed must be increasing.As I have shown in the picture even if their is minimal change but shouldn't it increase after a long time as minimal changes will keep accumulating.

None of them ever bother to do the same calculation going backward in time to determine the velocity a moment ago. If they did, they would see that the speed a moment ago must also have been higher. So the same [mistaken] argument proves with equal force both that speed is increasing and that it is decreasing.

Edit: Of course, that's the difference between a parabolic path and a circular path. For a parabolic path (constant acceleration), the speed really does increase both forward and backward in time. For a circular path (always perpendicular acceleration) the speed stays the same both ways.

Last edited:

- #15

A.T.

Science Advisor

- 11,657

- 2,951

To decrease velocity magnitude, you need an acceleration component anti-parallel to velocity.As I have shown in the picture even if their is minimal change but shouldn't it increase after a long time as minimal changes will keep accumulating.

To increase velocity magnitude, you need an acceleration component parallel to velocity.

If the acceleration has neither component, then velocity magnitude cannot change.

- #16

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir can you please explain me this point I can't understand what you want to say.None of them ever bother to do the same calculation going backward in time to determine the velocity a moment ago. If they did, they would see that the speed a moment ago must also have been higher. So the same [mistaken] argument proves with equal force both that speed is increasing and that it is decreasing.

- #17

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

The SUVAT equations work equally well in predicting how a system behaves going forward in time and going backward in time. You can trace the trajectory of a stone on string or a planet in its orbit into the future or into the past.Sir can you please explain me this point I can't understand what you want to say.

You have presented a calculation which purports to show velocity increasing into the future. How about applying that calculation to see how velocity behaves going into the past?

The laws of classical Newtonian physics are invariant under time reversal. If you can take a symmetric situation and derive an asymmetry, you've goofed.

Last edited:

- #18

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Sir how can I apply it?How about applying that calculation to see how velocity behaves going into the past?

- #19

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

Look at your original post. You evolved the velocity forward in time as the object moved to the right under a constant upward acceleration. Go back and do it again. But now the object is arriving from the left under constant upward acceleration and arrives at the center with rightward velocity v. What must its velocity have been a moment ago?Sir how can I apply it?

- #20

- 23,748

- 15,359

Sir how can I apply it?

I'm not sure how helpful this is. SUVAT equations assume constant force and constant acceleration, which cannot be the case if the force remains perpendicular to the velocity.

It's a pity you've been distracted from the mathematics in post #11.

- #21

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Please help me get out of this problem, which is correct explanation of this.

- #22

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

Your misunderstandings seem to go deep. Do you understand how a first derivative is defined? Do you understand limits? Tangent lines to a curve?Please help me get out of this problem, which is correct explanation of this.

- #23

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Education Advisor

- 29,565

- 15,017

Second, you are wasting the time of the people trying to help you as well as your own by not thinking about the answers you are gettng. How do I know this? Because your responses occur only minutes after someone else's post. You're not leaving enough time to think about it - and you just turn around and demand answers.

I don't think this is the first time this has been pointed out to you.

If you don't understand something, think about it. If you still don't understand, think some more. If you still don't understand, write a carefully composed message showing you have thought about it and discussing exactly what you don't understand. Don't just demand answers of us.

- #24

Frigus

- 337

- 157

So can you please tell me how can I give someone respect and as we can see most of the people on this thread are male so to whom may I say mam.Hemant, first, enough with the "Sir, if for no other reason than some of the "sirs" on PF are women.

- #25

- 18,141

- 10,969

It isn't necessary. Just talk to us like you would talk to a friend.So can you please tell me how can I give someone respect and as we can see most of the people on this thread are male so to whom may I say mam.

I see you have not bothered to put any information about yourself on in your profile so I can't tell for sure but I think it is a safe assumption that you come from a culture where it is very important to show overt respect for your elders and superiors. That's not necessary on this forum, just be polite and that's plenty.

- #26

- 10,075

- 10,636

Some cultures put more emphasis on honorifics than others. Culture on PhysicsForums mostly follows current western forms, which means first names (or nicknames, for those of us not posting under our real names) for more or less everyone short of a head of state. Just say thank you at the end of the thread, and that's enough.So can you please tell me how can I give someone respect and as we can see most of the people on this thread are male so to whom may I say mam.

- #27

Frigus

- 337

- 157

I accept it but my this habit is not wrong like someone can point it and criticize me

And I also want to share a thought "only that person has right to nag someone who praises."

And I also want to share a thought "only that person has right to nag someone who praises."

Last edited:

- #28

Frigus

- 337

- 157

Firstly,I am not wasting someone time and if one thought that I am wasting his/her time then please just don't reply to my thread it's just that and secondly I thought a lot about a topic and sometimes I reply fast because I have seen or thought that explanation earlier so I tell them what is the place where I am stuck.Second, you are wasting the time of the people trying to help you as well as your own by not thinking about the answers you are gettng.

- #29

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

That run-on sentence could use a lot of punctuation. It accomplishes nothing but to disavow responsibility for your actions. A complete waste of electrons.I am not wasting someone time...

The poor formatting conveys an impression of disrespect toward the reader. The explicit message is also one of disrespect.

- #30

- 18,141

- 10,969

- #31

Frigus

- 337

- 157

- #32

- 18,141

- 10,969

You do MUCH better than most of us would do in whatever your native language is

Last edited:

- #33

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 27,825

- 6,331

That's an easy one. Just make sure your replies to what they say show that you haveSo can you please tell me how can I give someone respect

In these matters it is always a good idea to assume ( and make it clear) that you are wrong if your personal reasoning leads you away from accepted Physics. (Unless you have studied it all and are at the leading edge of research.) "Why am I wrong?" not "I must be right, despite what they are telling me" It usually gets much more helpful responses.

Sirs and Mams are not worth much on PF; you could well find you are talking to someone younger than you who happens to know the answer.

Last edited:

- #34

- 10,075

- 10,636

- #35

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,573

- 6,221

Nicely put. Many of us just want to know that we are being listened to.That's an easy one. Just make sure you replies to what they say show that you havethoughtabout what they have said

Let us go back and examine a response that did not measure up to such a standard.

There is no feedback here to indicate that anything has been taken on board. There is no indication of what has been found wanting in any of the previously provided correct answers. There is only a renewed demand for a final answer.Please help me get out of this problem, which is correct explanation of this.

At the risk of reading more into a 14 word request than is actually there...

This is suggestive of a learning environment in which every question has a single "right answer" and in which the student's job is to produce the right answer on demand. In my upbringing, the preferred goal is understanding rather than on the parroting of "right answers". Understanding is a personal process. An explanation that works for one person may fail for someone else. We are trying to feed you an explanation which works for you. We cannot do that without feedback.

Share:

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 400

- Replies
- 30

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 202

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 322

- Replies
- 19

- Views
- 643

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 756

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 610

- Replies
- 22

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K