Central force and acceleration in the polar direction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a particle under a central force, particularly focusing on the relationship between radial forces and tangential acceleration in polar coordinates. Participants explore the implications of angular momentum conservation and the nature of velocity components in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that under a central force, the acceleration in the direction of ##\hat{\theta}## must be zero, leading to the conclusion that the tangential component of velocity, ##v_{\theta}##, cannot change.
  • Another participant counters that the initial velocity is ##v_{\theta}## and that if there were an acceleration in the ##\hat{\theta}## direction, angular momentum would not be conserved due to the presence of a net torque.
  • A different participant raises a question about the expression for velocity in polar coordinates, seeking clarification on its components.
  • One participant suggests considering a simpler case without any force, arguing that even in the absence of force, the components of velocity can change, indicating that the relationship between force and velocity components is not straightforward in polar coordinates.
  • Another participant states that ##v_{\theta}## not being constant does not imply that there is an acceleration in the ##\hat{\theta}## direction, suggesting a nuanced view of the relationship between velocity and acceleration in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of a central force on tangential acceleration and the behavior of velocity components. There is no consensus on whether the tangential component of velocity can change under a purely radial force.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities of motion in polar coordinates, particularly the dependence on the definitions of velocity and acceleration in non-Cartesian systems. Some assumptions about the nature of forces and motion may not be explicitly stated, leading to potential ambiguities.

Soren4
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
Consider a central force. The central force is radial by definition, so ##\vec{F}=f(r) \hat{r}##. Therefore, by definition, the acceleration caused by the force, in the direction of ##\hat{\theta}## must be zero, ##\vec{a_{\theta}}=0##.

In presence of central force angular momentum is conserved, in particular its magnitude, which is ##|\vec{L}|=m r^2 v_{\theta}##, where ##v_{\theta}## is the magnitude of the velocity of the body in the direction of ##\hat{\theta}##.
That means that the product ##r^2 v_{\theta}## stays constant and, if ##r## gets smaller, ##v_{\theta}## must increase.

Since ##v_{\theta}## is the magnitude of the velocity of the body in the direction of ##\hat{\theta}##, this means that there must be and acceleration in this direction, necessarily.

But how can this be possible, since, as said, the force is completely radial?

I'm ok with the fact that the force is not orthogonal to the velocity, hence the magnitude of the velocity can increase, but, in particular, I really don't see how the magnitude of the component ##v_{\theta}## can change, provided the fact that the force is radial.

In this picture it is clear that the magnitude of the velocity (which is tangential to the ellipse, of course) changes, but I can't understand the change in ##v_{\theta}##.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/99029
 
Science news on Phys.org
No, it doesn't mean that there is a theta component. It means that the initial velocity is v_theta. If there was an acceleration along theta, angular momentum wouldn't be conserved. There would be a non-zero net torque.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does v equal in polar coordinates?
 
Soren4 said:
I'm ok with the fact that the force is not orthogonal to the velocity, hence the magnitude of the velocity can increase, but, in particular, I really don't see how the magnitude of the component ##v_{\theta}## can change, provided the fact that the force is radial.
Before you take on elliptical orbits in a central force, consider the simpler case of no force at all. What is the equation of motion of a particle that starts at the point ##(\theta=0,r=1))## with a speed ##v## in the tangential direction? It's not subject to any force or acceleration at all, yet neither the ##\theta## nor the ##r## components of its velocity are constant.

Cartesian coordinates have the nice property that the basis vectors are functions of neither position nor time, so when you rewrite ##\vec{F}=m\vec{a}## as the differential equation ##\frac{d^2\vec{r}(t)}{dt^2}=\frac{\vec{F}}{m}## it simplifies into ##\frac{d^2A_x(t)}{dt^2}=\frac{F_x}{m}## (and likewise for the y and z components) and you can safely conclude that if ##F_x=0## then ##v_x## will be a constant. More general coordinate systems don't necessarily work that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Soren4
vθ not being constant does not mean that the acceleration in the theta direction is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Soren4

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
777
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
922
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K