Why am I struggling with multiple choice exams in A level Chemistry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasannapakkiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
AI Thread Summary
Struggling with multiple choice exams in A level Chemistry is a common issue, particularly with the Cambridge format that includes complex questions. A student reported scoring 82% overall but only 14/40 on the multiple choice section, despite excelling in structured theory questions. The discussion highlights the importance of practice and understanding the basics to improve performance on multiple choice exams. Strategies such as elimination and focused study on question types may help address the difficulties faced. Overall, consistent practice and refining test-taking strategies are essential for success in these challenging assessments.
prasannapakkiam
:frown:I just got the results from a mock exam that actually counts towards next year... I got 82%. However everyone else got 95+! It is the multichoice - I got 14/40 for it! The structured theory - I got 98%. Does anybody have any good sites or tips to combat this Multichoice problem I have? Also this is A level Chemistry conducted by Cambridge... So they have this 'multiple multi choice'. I just do not see why I get soo bad. Is it due to lack of study? or just lack of practice? :frown::frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello! friend the pattern also exists in IIT-JEE of india...we too have to make it out...the general strategy to solve multi's is to solve from the basics and to solve the " by-products" hand-by-hand..so to get a list of answerrs...
cheers!
 
Really? My cousins tell that once in IIT, it is a worry free life for them! But then again, they barely passed... But with the ambiguities in these MC questions, I just cannot do them in time! The same story goes for my Physics: Structured lim--> 100, multichoice lim-->0. So elimination and more study is probably the only way through them?
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

AP Chemistry exam question (multi-choice): What should I know?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Can I Catch Up on Years of Math in Two Years for a High School Exam?
Replies
7
Views
2K
An interesting GCSE question: Why are electric lamps connected in parallel in house wiring?
Replies
14
Views
474
Testing Struggling with Physics: Am I Cut Out for This Major?
Replies
10
Views
2K
How Likely Are Specific Answer Distributions on Multiple Choice Exams?
Replies
8
Views
2K
How can I improve my performance on chemistry multiple choice exams?
Replies
1
Views
7K
Chemistry Finding Chemistry Internships: Am I Being Too Choosy?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Schools Graduate school applications: am I shooting too high?
Replies
30
Views
4K
Why Am I Struggling with Physics and Maths Despite My Efforts?
Replies
4
Views
2K
How Can I Address Issues with a Chemistry Professor?
Replies
38
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top