Why an electric motor is used in hybrid cars

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of electric motors in hybrid cars, exploring the reasons for their use alongside internal combustion (IC) engines. Participants examine concepts such as regenerative braking, fuel economy, and the efficiency of electric versus combustion engines, while raising questions about the overall energy dynamics in hybrid vehicles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why electric motors are necessary in hybrid cars if they are primarily charged by IC engines, suggesting that the IC engine could suffice alone.
  • Regenerative braking is proposed as a significant advantage of hybrid systems, with inquiries into its contribution to overall energy efficiency and fuel economy.
  • There are claims that the electric motor primarily supports regenerative braking and provides additional power, while the IC engine is seen as the main energy source.
  • Some participants highlight that electric motors are more efficient across a broader range of power outputs compared to IC engines, particularly in urban driving conditions.
  • One participant mentions that the small combustion engine can charge the batteries more efficiently than it can directly power the vehicle, suggesting a complementary relationship between the two systems.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency claims of IC engines and electric motors, with discussions about the real-world efficiency of both types of engines and the implications for fuel consumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the efficiency and roles of electric motors and IC engines in hybrid vehicles. Participants express differing opinions on the significance of regenerative braking and the overall energy dynamics involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various efficiency metrics and studies, but there is no consensus on the accuracy of these figures or their implications for hybrid vehicle performance. The discussion includes assumptions about the efficiency of both electric and combustion engines that are not universally accepted.

  • #31
I know I'm late, but...
xxChrisxx said:
As you've now taken MPG and MPGe which are comparable, as they are tank-to-wheel numbers (inc. charging loss which is acceptable to include). Then applied a factor that is then taking into account upstream efficiency on the EV but not on the conventional fuel.
Don't the upstream efficiency numbers of the EV exclude the same mining and refinement that the conventional fuel do? In other words, isn't the natural gas used in a gas turbine identical to what powers your stove? And isn't the fuel oil used in a power plant similar in its refinement to what is used in a car?
You've also got to be to be very careful about where you getting figures from.

So all we can safely conclude is: it is difficult to conclude anything just from a numbers exercise.
Understood, which is why for my purposes I tracked my fuel economy with a spreadsheet and made calculations based on my driving patterns to help decide if (not) I should by a hybrid or a regular gas car.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
OmCheeto said:
I would highly recommend that everyone ignore this comment.
As one of my hero's says; "We blow things up, so you don't have to."

I performed this experiment on my last vehicle, where if I thought I was going to be sitting for at least 20 seconds, I shut off my engine. My starter lasted a week. It may have been a coincidence, but I don't think so. Starters on regular vehicles are simply not designed to start your engine every 5 minutes.
Well, it isn't like I have the persistence to do this on a regular basis anyway, so I'm sure I'll be fine.
Unless you turn a gas engine off, it is using gas.

Didn't you say a while back that you'd purchased one of those fancy aftermarket fuel consumption gauges? Does it read out in gallons per hour? Or liters per minute. I really need to get one of those.
Yes, I have and it does. Once warmed-up, the engine does not use gas when coasting. Which therefore also means the fuel economy increases markedly when the engine is warm.

At idle, it uses about 0.5 gal/hr which if the car runs at 30mpg highway is 1/4 of highway fuel consumption at 60mph. That's an awful lot of gas wasted idling!
 
  • #33
mheslep said:
If your calculation continues upstream from the tank (battery) back to the well (power station), then it should be done on both sides. An actual gallon of gas has to be transported and refined (10-20% energy overhead).
As I asked-of Chris, doesn't a gallon of oil used to generate electricity also need similar refining and transporting?
 
  • #34
russ_watters said:
As I asked-of Chris, doesn't a gallon of oil used to generate electricity also need similar refining and transporting?
Sure, but then oil fired electric generation is less than 1% of US generation and falling. By contrast no refining step is required for natural gas.
 
  • #35
When oil-fired generating plants were in operation, the fuel did not need to be highly refined like the motor fuels used in cars and trucks (i.e., gasoline and diesel). In fact, the residual fraction from the refinery (what was left after the gasoline and diesel was produced) was used for firing generating plants and for large ships which used heavy fuel oil for large steam or slow speed diesel propulsion plants. To be sure, the residual fraction was not used solely for fuel, but it was a by-product of the refining process.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K