Why Are Adult Sites Still Legal in the USA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Adult sites remain legal in the USA primarily due to the First Amendment, which protects freedom of expression as long as all participants are consenting adults. The government does not endorse pornography but prioritizes individual freedom over moral judgments. While it is illegal for minors to access such content, enforcing restrictions is challenging due to the internet's anonymity. Many argue that personal responsibility and parental guidance are essential in managing children's exposure to pornography. Ultimately, the debate reflects differing views on morality and freedom in a democratic society.
  • #51
The question of this thread was, "Why can't we ban porn?"

The USA discovered, when they tried to ban alchohol, that banning it does not make it go away, it just makes it more possible for illegal sources to make money from it and make it harder to regulate. Bootleggers and speakeasies still sold alcohol, they could just charge more for it because it wasn't legal. Criminals love it when a popular item is banned.

As for children being exposed to it, there are several recommended methods to limiting this possibility:

Place the computer in a high traffic area of the home, dining room, kitchen, family room, etc. not in the child's room.

Teach them what is right. Explain (at their level) why porn can be wrong (can exploit the participants, can involve underage participants, can over time make a person jaded to sex, plays on a weakness (addiction) in some people, etc)

Look at the computer with them. (This can't be done all of the time, but give them examples of where to surf.)

Check their history file and see where they do surf. (Most kids will know ways to get rid of the evidence, but maybe they will forget once or twice and you can catch them. Also, kids don't have rights as far as computer privacy. An adult needs to be responsible for their actions until they are old enough to know better.)

Now, as for TV. If parents paid attention to what their kids were watching on TV then sex could be shown on TV, just don't let the kids watch that show. Then porn sites would die off naturally, just like adult book stores died off when porn became prevailent on the internet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
You can't band porn on the internet becouse it's put on on it in countrys that recpect freedom of speach and press. And alldo these fredoms are sometimes very harmful to the pepole they are adobtet by most of the modern countrys.
 
  • #53
Artman said:
The question of this thread was, "Why can't we ban porn?"

The USA discovered, when they tried to ban alchohol, that banning it does not make it go away, it just makes it more possible for illegal sources to make money from it and make it harder to regulate. Bootleggers and speakeasies still sold alcohol, they could just charge more for it because it wasn't legal. Criminals love it when a popular item is banned.

As for children being exposed to it, there are several recommended methods to limiting this possibility:

Place the computer in a high traffic area of the home, dining room, kitchen, family room, etc. not in the child's room.

Teach them what is right. Explain (at their level) why porn can be wrong (can exploit the participants, can involve underage participants, can over time make a person jaded to sex, plays on a weakness (addiction) in some people, etc)

Look at the computer with them. (This can't be done all of the time, but give them examples of where to surf.)

Check their history file and see where they do surf. (Most kids will know ways to get rid of the evidence, but maybe they will forget once or twice and you can catch them. Also, kids don't have rights as far as computer privacy. An adult needs to be responsible for their actions until they are old enough to know better.)

Now, as for TV. If parents paid attention to what their kids were watching on TV then sex could be shown on TV, just don't let the kids watch that show. Then porn sites would die off naturally, just like adult book stores died off when porn became prevailent on the internet.

All good suggestions. You can block the majority of this by your own internet settings. And, yes, I have had to change the password before and yes, teenage boys are smart enough to delete the history file - but mine haven't learned about the temporary internet files, yet. So there are a couple ways to monitor what they're surfing (and if you've ever browsed through the temporary internet files, you'll realize that, short of the overly obvious method of deleting all of them, deleting the the individual 'tip-off' files is enough of a pain to be a deterrent to habitual porn surfing). If nothing else, a periodic browse through the temporary internet files at least tips you off as to which sites you need to add to your blocked internet sites, a little more preferable method than constant monitoring.
 
  • #54
Not only do I agree with LENIN (not the one that's dead :wink:) but I think you guys should be careful. You could slip into nazis in this direction (just a bit provocative). You cannot erase everything that bothers you.

Example : would you erase prostitution as well ?

Maybe I misundestood : as long as you are trying to protect your children : OK, that is totally legitimate and I will do it as well. Prevent access from a computer is something (difficult). But ban it from the internet !? Not only is there no way to do so, but I fear it is a dangerous way of thinking.
 
  • #55
LENIN said:
You can't band porn on the internet becouse it's put on on it in countrys that recpect freedom of speach and press. And alldo these fredoms are sometimes very harmful to the pepole they are adobtet by most of the modern countrys.
Yeah! What this guy said. :-p
 
  • #56
The Internet is for Porn (song)

Download;
http://www.hapklaar.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=UpDownload&file=index&req=getit&lid=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #57
humanino said:
Maybe I misundestood : as long as you are trying to protect your children : OK, that is totally legitimate and I will do it as well.
That's my only interest. Getting kids involved in cr@p like porn pretty much destroys them psycologically for the rest of their lives, and especially if there's force involved. The main point I was trying to make is that if there is some kind of conflict between an adult's right to access porn, and a human child's right not to be subjected to this then the child's right supercedes the other. This is not a slippery slope situation.

Since child pornography is already illegal I don't understand why the FBI or whoever is in charge of this can't just automatically shut down any sites that have any child porn on them. I'm not talking about iffy situations where someone might scratch their head and wonder if a girl in a picture is 16 or 18, I'm talking about pictures I've seen where the kid is clearly 10 years old being mounted by a 6 ft tall adult man.

Is it not technically possible to locate the source of these sites and disable them?
 
  • #58
Artman said:
The question of this thread was, "Why can't we ban porn?"

The USA discovered, when they tried to ban alchohol, that banning it does not make it go away, it just makes it more possible for illegal sources to make money from it and make it harder to regulate. Bootleggers and speakeasies still sold alcohol, they could just charge more for it because it wasn't legal. Criminals love it when a popular item is banned.

I don't think we shouldn't try to ban things though. What will the world do when child pornography becomes more prevalent? Are we going to regulate that through the government as well?

If we want to get rid of pornography sites we should develop a section of the government and give them the ability to automatically delete inappropriate websites in their country. A universal FTP access program would suit the situation well.
 
  • #59
Why don't we shut down sites that have people quoting the bible to argue that porn sites should be shut down? You know why we can't? Because it's the right of the people to have it. You can't censor something just because you don't like it.
 
  • #60
Dooga Blackrazor said:
I don't think we shouldn't try to ban things though. What will the world do when child pornography becomes more prevalent? Are we going to regulate that through the government as well?

If we want to get rid of pornography sites we should develop a section of the government and give them the ability to automatically delete inappropriate websites in their country. A universal FTP access program would suit the situation well.

Does everyone want those sites (legitimate adult material) blocked? No. Or else they would not be as popular (albeit underground :smile:) as they are. As in prohibition, if there is a market, someone will figure out a source.

As for child pornography, this is already illegal (banned and unlawful to view and distribute). It still occurs. As I said, if there is a market, unfortunately there is some creep out there to exploit it.
 
  • #61
zoobyshoe said:
Is it not technically possible to locate the source of these sites and disable them?

Nope. If you're hosting the site in a country where this material IS legal, there's not much the FBI can do. Another thing people do is make the servers of legitimate businesses unwitting hosts of this content. A few years back we found out that our servers were taken over and used for content - not porn in our case - but this type of strategy is frequently employed by these shady operations.
 
  • #62
zoobyshoe said:
I'm talking about banning porn on the web. The more demand there is for porn the more of it that is made. If yanking all porn from the web meant less child porn would be made, then I could live without the legal porn.

You may speechify in defense of your freedom to look at porn but don't forget your freedom to look at porn provides a nice, anonymous, legally protected privacy, for the people who rape children, film it, and put it on the web. I realize they're putting it on the web illegally, but no one seems to be stopping them. If[/color] banning web porn helped cut down on the number of kids made to participate in this stuff, then[/color] I could live without the legal porn on the web. Since it is illegal I don't understand why any site with child pornography isn't already automatically shut down.

The 800 pound gorilla sitting on top of the porn issue isn't the morality of sex, it's the issue of the people, particularly in foreign countries, who are forced to participate. When these are children, I can't believe anyone wouldn't have something more productive to remark than the shrug: "Well, banning porn isn't going to stop child abuse anyway, so whatdaya want?"

You keep missing the point. Child porn is already illegal. You can speechify in defense of a policy that might seem like a good idea, but this would only make the problem worse. It would only drain already limited resources.
 
  • #63
I don't know why people always look to the government for answers. If anything this needs to start at the other end of the system. Drugs, violence, terrorism, child porn, drunk driving, ... are all damn illegal and adding more laws doesn't prevent anything.

20% of people will always be honest and do the moral thing.
20% of people will always go against the moral thing and follow their greed
60% of people will sit somewhere in between, if the chance comes they'll capitalize if they don't think they'll get caught.

I heard this from an economics proff.
 
  • #64
Since my Arlington, Virginia libraries decided not to censor Internet access, all web porn there is potentially in full view of children. I wouldn't be surprised if kids use the libraries as a government-sponsored peepshow (in my day I would have, when without supervision). I'm not against most erotica, but I would like to apply the standards of print and film media adult-only availability to the more gratuitous computer obscenity.
 
  • #65
Could the OP please answer my question about how you are able to tell the difference between incest sex and normal sex just by the pictures?

Thought I'd add something else to this as well. About 3 years ago I got an email from one of my friends with a link to what I would call a run of the mill porn site. Yes, I went to it. On this site there was a spot to enter your email addy to receive porn every day. Sooooo, I went to yahoo and created an account just for this purpose. Well, now I get so much darn porn stuff it is unbelievable. But, none of it is really that big of a deal. Lots of boobs and that is about it. I still check it every day because there are a few other things I use the account for that are somewhat important. Every day there are about 100 messages in there concerning porn. I delete every one of them without even looking. The times that I have checked, there are links to porn sites and they want your money. They show nothing but boobs unless you can provide a c/c number so they can 'verify your age'. LMAO Yeah right... I have yet to see a wide open crotch in this spam.

The other night I was in an adult yahoo chat room and kept getting a response from this woman who wanted to view my cam. I said I won't turn it on for them unless they have one and then I wasn't going to show them anything 'fun' anyway. They kept bugging me and bugging me and I said not without a cam of your own. Finally they gave in and turned theirs on and low and behold there was this 12 year old Asian boy behind the cam. Sooooooo, banning porn sites on the internet is not going to keep kids from viewing things you may think they should be viewing. You can ban your kids from chatrooms, but strangely enough, kids can find a way around just about anything. Especially concerning computers. Oh, incidentally, have you looked at some of the profiles on yahoo with pictures? Oh my word some people have incredible imaginations!
 
  • #66
As has been pointed out many times, making something illegal doesn't get rid of it. Drugs are illegal in the US, yet, kids still buy and use drugs. Every time you add a new rule and need to enforce it, it takes manpower away from enforcement of other rules because there are only so many police to go around.

On the other point made about checking kids' history on the computer, and them being able to erase it, a pretty good sign of a kid guilty of viewing pages they know they shouldn't be is an empty history! It's sort of like coming home to a sparkling clean house when you've left the teenagers home alone for a weekend...you know they weren't suddenly inspired to clean, they had a party and cleaned the mess to hide the evidence!

I think kids have way too much privacy nowadays. When I was a kid, there was no such thing as a TV and phone in your own room, no less your own phone line. If I was on the phone talking to a boy, I was sitting in the middle of the kitchen with the rest of the family listening in. There was one TV, and we all sat and watched the same shows together. Same for the stereo, we had to listen to whatever our parents were willing to put on. Earning the privilege to talk on the phone while the rest of the family went to a different room was just that, a privilege, not a right. Children are given far too many liberties before their parents have ensured they are mature enough to handle them.
 
  • #67
Moonbear said:
On the other point made about checking kids' history on the computer, and them being able to erase it, a pretty good sign of a kid guilty of viewing pages they know they shouldn't be is an empty history! It's sort of like coming home to a sparkling clean house when you've left the teenagers home alone for a weekend...you know they weren't suddenly inspired to clean, they had a party and cleaned the mess to hide the evidence!

Moonbear,

Try this. Open your history window. Right click on any item in it (like one of the pop-up ads or something. You get the option to delete just that item. It doesn't take much sophistication for kids to figure that out. Hence the value of the temporary internet files folder. That's harder to manipulate without at least a risk of making it incredibly obvious (depending on how often you check it).
 
  • #68
Artman said:
As for child pornography, this is already illegal (banned and unlawful to view and distribute). It still occurs. As I said, if there is a market, unfortunately there is some creep out there to exploit it.
What is preventing the FBI or whoever from turning these sites off? Is it a technical impossibility? I would think they had the authority and technical means to do this.
 
  • #69
It is the interpretation of the US Constitution. Porn is protected by the First Amendment. And I am sure glad it is, though I never read it. The last thing I would want is for the FBI to be the judge of what is "dirty".
 
  • #70
selfAdjoint said:
It is the interpretation of the US Constitution. Porn is protected by the First Amendment. And I am sure glad it is, though I never read it. The last thing I would want is for the FBI to be the judge of what is "dirty".
I'm not talking about porn. I'm talking about psychological and sexual abuse of children. This is already illegal.

I could link you to photographs of children being abused in this way that I have come across inserted into otherwise "consenting adult" porn. It would be illegal for me to create such a link, apparently, and yet no one seems to be able to shut these sites down.

Someone's making money somewhere off of raping children and photographing it. These kids lives are being ruined before they have any real chance to get started. You think these kids are going to just shake this off and put it behind them someday? You think they're going to get themselves into a good school and learn physics and become researchers and teachers? If you do, you're quite naive. Think rather: severe depression, personality disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, prostitution, suicidal tendencies. Could you think about that before you sit and complacently express gratitude the FBI isn't making decisions about what's dirty?

Perhaps banning porn would be ineffectual in cutting down on this abuse of kids, but I am becoming increasingly alarmed and irritated that people's responses seem to have to be filtered through the muck of their own petty rights before there is any thought about how completely defenseless kids are having their lives ruined. I get the feeling some of you people wouldn't pull someone out of a burning car if it happened on your coffee break because you have a right to your coffee break.
 
  • #71
zoobyshoe said:
Perhaps banning porn would be ineffectual in cutting down on this abuse of kids, but I am becoming increasingly alarmed and irritated that people's responses seem to have to be filtered through the muck of their own petty rights before there is any thought about how completely defenseless kids are having their lives ruined. I get the feeling some of you people wouldn't pull someone out of a burning car if it happened on your coffee break because you have a right to your coffee break.

It's an ironic bizarrerie that today's politically correct existensialism, in which culture is reduced to only that which offends no one, puts so much effort into protecting such an offensive form of free speech.

But, in this case, the others are right on two fronts.

The internet is a global phenomenon. One country can't control what goes over the internet, nor can it control the treatment of children in other countries.

As much of a pain as it is to keep porn off the family computer, the harm in strict controls on internet traffic would be worse.

As it is, in the US, you can be prosecuted for making child porn movies, selling or distributing child porn either over the internet, through videos, or magazines, or for possessing any the preceding. Quite a few do get caught, which is why so much porn and gambling comes from off-shore sites specializing in things which would be illegal in the US.
 
  • #72
zooby,

Do you think selfAdjoint was responding to your post previous to his? If so, your response is warranted.
 
  • #73
zoobyshoe said:
I'm not talking about porn. I'm talking about psychological and sexual abuse of children. This is already illegal.

I could link you to photographs of children being abused in this way that I have come across inserted into otherwise "consenting adult" porn. It would be illegal for me to create such a link, apparently, and yet no one seems to be able to shut these sites down.

Someone's making money somewhere off of raping children and photographing it. These kids lives are being ruined before they have any real chance to get started. You think these kids are going to just shake this off and put it behind them someday? You think they're going to get themselves into a good school and learn physics and become researchers and teachers? If you do, you're quite naive. Think rather: severe depression, personality disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, prostitution, suicidal tendencies. Could you think about that before you sit and complacently express gratitude the FBI isn't making decisions about what's dirty?

Perhaps banning porn would be ineffectual in cutting down on this abuse of kids, but I am becoming increasingly alarmed and irritated that people's responses seem to have to be filtered through the muck of their own petty rights before there is any thought about how completely defenseless kids are having their lives ruined. I get the feeling some of you people wouldn't pull someone out of a burning car if it happened on your coffee break because you have a right to your coffee break.

As you pointed out child pornogrraphy is illegal, so its continuing presence online is a criminal justice problem. The police can never eliminate crime, only make arrests where they have evidence and can identify the offender. I believe that voluntary display of child ponography is grounds already for a site to be shut down. Why don't you notify your local FBI office when you detect some?.
 
  • #74
zoobyshoe said:
What is preventing the FBI or whoever from turning these sites off? Is it a technical impossibility? I would think they had the authority and technical means to do this.
I imagine that they have to infitrate to get proof that it is happening. I'm just guessing, but I would imagine that they disguise them fairly well. The FBI probably does shut down many of them. I really don't know.
 
  • #75
I just read today in the paper that China started a crackdown on porn around july 16th. They've sent people to jail even. They said they didn't want to corrupt the minds of the young people.

So, how about you go live there? Sounds like they got everything under control and just the way you like it.
 
  • #76
I had a friend from another country that has an extreme cultural bias against pornography. We were playing chess while his cousin and her kids watched HBO [early HBO, this was in about 1987]. A soft porn movie came on - probably the equivalent of an R rated movie today. The mother went nuts! "Oh my God! Don't they know that kids are watching at this time of day?" She was just beside herself and quickly grabbed for the remote control to find something appropriate for the kids.

They then watched a Terminator-like movie! I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Personally, I think people blowing each other heads off and dismembering each other, and scenes of people taking joy in killing does more damage to a young mind, and society in general, than any nudity that I ever saw on HBO.

Edit: I still can't get over this. AMAZING. On HBO two people were making love, or at least doing something perfectly natural, but the preferred option was something horrid, sickening, and very unnatural.

Saint, do you like Terminator movies?
 
Last edited:
  • #77
Goalie_Ca said:
I just read today in the paper that China started a crackdown on porn around july 16th. They've sent people to jail even. They said they didn't want to corrupt the minds of the young people.

So, how about you go live there? Sounds like they got everything under control and just the way you like it.
In some of the larger cities in China, access to some web pages is disabled. Enforcement is not uniform across the country, fortunately.

I personally feel good that Big Brother is protecting me from access to porn, or to anything else that might be deemed by those in power to be detrimental to them.
 
  • #78
Can someone give me some convincing reasons why do people need porn?
How can porn be good to people's mentality ?
 
  • #79
Saint said:
Can someone give me some convincing reasons why do people need porn?
How can porn be good to people's mentality ?
You lead such a sheltered life. Go ask your mother.
 
  • #80
This may not be enough for Saint but for guys that can't get girls and don't want to waste mony on prostiutes porn is a easy way out. :frown:
And here is another idea if young people would watch enough porn the world population wouldn't grow this fast (don't take this seriusly) :biggrin: .
 
  • #81
I suppose that there is no really good reason that Poeple actually "need porn". I don't think that It is required for a person to have a good mentality. Having said that, when trying to change a law or socially accepted institution, the burden of proof does not lie on that institution to defend itself, the burden of proof lies on the force that wants to cause the change.

just out of curiosity is there any difference in your view between two or 50 consenting adults rent a gym and lock all the doors and look at each others naked bodies or an adult well within the rights of the law sitting at his or her computer searching for picturs of those same two or 50 people?
 
  • #82
Well, we as animals have necessity of sex. I don't see why if somebody wrote a book 2000 years ago saying that this is obscene/sinful we should then put a stop to our instincts
 
  • #83
meteor said:
Well, we as animals have necessity of sex. I don't see why if somebody wrote a book 2000 years ago saying that this is obscene/sinful we should then put a stop to our instincts

Did they?
According to what i know of that novel called bible,
Jesus had no problems talking to or being in the presence of a prostitute.
Nor did he have a problem with what she did for a living.

@Saint
Then of to why porn isn't a problem.
Agreed some pron does require you to have a peculiar taste to say the least.
But what is wrong with that?
Heck, its the smae stuff you and you wife did, afteral you have a kid, and those don't grow on fertile soil now do they.
Also you probably didn't mind creating your kid.

So what is wrong with watching it?
My parents had no objections with me watching erotic scenes in movies (they didn't go as far as to encourage me to whatch porn).
Point its, why not educate your kids about it, starting when they are young.
It will make them familiar with what sex is, makes them aware of the risks (pregnancy, sexualy transmitted diseases e.g.) and teaches them to protect them self.
Because trust me, the more you tell a kid he can't watch something, the more he'll WANT to see it.
Then looking at porn (or even plain nudity) will become something secret (in effect creating a taboo) and your kid will associate sex with secrecy and dirty for the rest of his/her life.

AND THATS WRONG!
Sex is healthy, fun, probably one of the ultimate forms to show your affection to someone.
Ohh and did i say fun already?

Ohh and the final question.
You believe in God, right?
God is almighty? I'm right on that one again, aren't I?

THEN WHY ON EARTH DID HE ALLOW PORN IF HE DOESN'T LIKE IT!??!? :surprise:
Ouch, that one struck a nerv didn't it?
 
  • #84
This thread is pretty humorous, people debating the intentions of a 2,000 year old mythological creature.
 
  • #85
Sex is private, why disclose it on the net for others to see?
 
  • #86
Sex is private ? Says who ? The Saint ?
 
  • #87
Saint said:
Sex is private, why disclose it on the net for others to see?
Because others want to see it.

Most likely, those performing want others to see it.

If you don't want to see it, don't go looking for it.

If you don't want your kids to see it, be a parent and watch their internet activities or get a porn blocker.

What is the problem?

Nobody wants you, the government, or the church in their bedrooms, so STAY OUT.
 
  • #88
Humans are civilized beings, therefore they wear clothes.
But it seems that humans have degraded to the level of animals, exposing their genitals proudly to people!
 
  • #89
I agree there is a tumbling of morality going on, the redefinition of values. I have my own values I hold on to, luckily.

Saint: there are many things on the internet that are objectionable, but it is a free medium. There's a freedom of speech, a governmental censor would take away one of the basic rights. Ofcourse a thing you could do is start an action group and collect signatures and present that to the government: if they feel there really is a conflict in morality, action might be taken.
 
  • #90
Saint said:
Humans are civilized beings, therefore they wear clothes.
But it seems that humans have degraded to the level of animals, exposing their genitals proudly to people!

Please explain your perceived implication between the wearing of clothes and civilization. I'm rather puzzled.

Aftertought : Using bold script does not lend weight to a statement, merely to the annoyance of those reading it.
 
  • #91
Monique said:
Saint: there are many things on the internet that are objectionable, but it is a free medium.

Wasnt there going to be a law passed that you couldn't make racist comments online? I mean calling the French "frogs" n stuff?
 
  • #92
Well Dimitri, not long ago a nudist organisation decided to organize a bicycle tour through several cities. The police came and asked them to put their clothes back on. Nudity is not generally accepted behaviour. I avoid watching dutch movies, they are littered with nudity.

I personally think it's perverted behaviour to go out and look for material like that. I feel the same about the beheading videos everyone was watching or the other shocking television programs or websites.
 
  • #93
Monique said:
Well Dimitri, not long ago a nudist organisation decided to organize a bicycle tour through several cities. The police came and asked them to put their clothes back on. Nudity is not generally accepted behaviour. I avoid watching dutch movies, they are littered with nudity.

I personally think it's perverted behaviour to go out and look for material like that. I feel the same about the beheading videos everyone was watching or the other shocking television programs or websites.

But you recognize that it is each person's decision to make about what he/she wants to watch or avoid.

There is a difference between bicycling nude down public streets and posing nude in internet sites or movies. It's this difference that makes the first case illegal.

If you found porn on a regular (say educational) website or TV show, that would certainly be wrong. And if you found religious dogma on a science forum (say PF), that would be in need of censorship too.

I'm shocked at the level of porn...errr, I mean preaching...that I'm being "unfairly" exposed to in this forum.
 
  • #94
Gokul43201 said:
But you recognize that it is each person's decision to make about what he/she wants to watch or avoid.
You are right. But we can still question the psychological effect these issues are having on society as a whole and in what direction this is going to take us.

I don't see a ban happening since the internet is not owned by anyone, it's free terrain, there are software programs available that protect the individual from inappropriate content :)
 
  • #95
First time when i saw nude woman, i was very excited, after sometime, i was not excited anymore.
Excessive porns make women uninteresting to men.
 
  • #96
Saint said:
First time when i saw nude woman, i was very excited, after sometime, i was not excited anymore.
Excessive porns make women uninteresting to men.
Ah, the voice of experience. Thank you for sacrificing yourself to gain the experience so that we can benefit from your insights and be saved from the suffering ourselves.
 
  • #97
exposing genitals to people is an act of beast! Very Low-class.
 
  • #98
I doubt that anyone wanted to read this on PF.

Do you think you're the only one who doesn't like this stuff? That's why you're allowed to avoid it.

You may think of other people whatever you want, but don't expect other people to accept your moral values.
 
  • #99
Saint said:
this is what you usually get in porn sites:
7) etc...NASTY

Do you call this Freedom?[/size]

Clearly, you have paid no attention to what we've been saying over the last 6 pages.

I find it infuriating that you start a thread, and then refuse to participate in the discussion. Instead, you periodically spew irrelevant rhetoric.

Join in the discussion, or stay out of it ! If you won't make the effort to read our posts, I don't see why we should humor your idle crusades.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #100
Saint said:
this is what you usually get in porn sites:
7) etc...NASTY

For someone who doesn't like porn sites, you sure are knowledgeable of the content!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

News Is USA Today Misrepresenting Economic Data on Young Americans' Incomes?
Replies
5
Views
3K
News Bush Administration: My Indictment
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top