Why Are Certain Beam Mode Shapes Vertically Straight?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics of mode shapes in the context of free vibration analysis of vertical beams, specifically focusing on why certain mode shapes appear vertically straight. The scope includes theoretical analysis and practical applications related to structural dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the nature of mode shapes, particularly noting that the second mode shape of a vertical beam fixed at the ground appears vertically straight, regardless of the presence of a lumped mass.
  • Another participant suggests that the terms "free" and "fixed" may hold significance in understanding the behavior of the beam, implying a potential contradiction in the analysis.
  • A participant questions whether the scenario involves a flag pole column, seeking clarification on the specific situation being analyzed.
  • One participant describes their analysis of a water tower with varying lumped masses and cross-sectional shapes, noting that the second mode is vertically straight with a lumped mass but curved without it, prompting further inquiry into the cause.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by "vertically straight," asking for details about the deformation shape and direction of vibrational displacement.
  • A participant clarifies that the vibrational displacement occurs laterally, while the static equilibrium position remains vertical, suggesting that the mode shape reflects displacements around this vertical position.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation regarding the nature of mode shapes, with no consensus reached on the underlying reasons for the observed behaviors.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of "free" and "fixed" conditions in the analysis, as well as the implications of lumped mass on mode shapes. The discussion does not clarify the mathematical or physical principles governing these observations.

roldy
Messages
206
Reaction score
2
I have never been able to grasp why certain mode shapes are the way they are. For example, I ran a free vibration analysis on a vertical beam fixed at the ground. The second mode shape is vertically straight. This is the same case whether or not I have a lumped mass at the top of the beam. Any thoughts on what would cause a mode shape to be vertical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roldy said:
For example, I ran a free vibration analysis on a vertical beam fixed at the ground.

The clue might be in the two words "free" and "fixed". Your beam could be either one or the other, but it can't be both at the same time.
 
So, are you talking about the vibrations of a flag pole column, with and/without a tip mass? Is that the situation you are trying to analyze here?
 
I'm analyzing a water tower. I have three cases that I'm looking into no lumped mass, 20,000 lb, 40,000lb. For each case I use a solid and hollow cross section for the tower. So all together I have 6 runs. For all the runs that have a lumped mass, the second mode is vertically straight. Without a lumped mass I get a curved mode shape. I'm trying to figure out why this is.
 
It is pretty difficult to understand what you mean by "vertically straight." What is the deformation shape then? What direction is the vibrational displacement?
 
The vibrational displacement is to the left and right. What I mean by vertically straight is that it is perfectly vertical.
 
If the static equilibrium position is straight up, then the lateral vibration modes will appear as displacements about this vertical position. The mode shape is always superimposed upon the static equilibrium position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K