Why are mirror charges created?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CraigH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Mirror
AI Thread Summary
When a charge is placed near an uncharged conductor, a mirror charge of equal and opposite magnitude is created on the opposite side of the conductor, which helps to cancel the electric field inside the conductor. This phenomenon occurs because the electric field induces a redistribution of charges within the conductor until the net force on them is zero. The mirror charge is a mathematical construct that simplifies the calculation of electric fields, as it allows one to analyze the field lines between the real charge and the mirror charge instead of the actual ground plane. In the context of antennas, oscillating charges create electromagnetic waves, and the concept of mirror charges aids in understanding the dipole effect, although the mirror charge itself is not physically present. Ultimately, the mirror charge serves as a useful tool in electrostatics and antenna theory, despite its imaginary nature.
CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
When a charge is placed next to an uncharged conductor, a mirrored image of that charge is created on the other side of the uncharged conductor. The mirrored image charge will have an equal and opposite magnitude to the original charge.

For example, if there was a 1C point charge 1m away from a thin metal sheet, it will appear as if there is a -1C point charge on the other side of this metal sheet.

The electric field lines in the x direction would look like this:

+o--------->|--------->o-

Why does this happen? All I know so far is that when a conductor is placed inside an electric field, the charges inside it are re-arranged. This seems intuitive, as an electric field is just a vector field that denotes what force a positive 1 coulomb charge would feel a particular point in space, so the charges inside the conductor will have a force on them, and will move until they are in a position where there there is no net force on them. This will be when the electric fields inside the conductor cancel out.

In my example diagram the positive charge will cause the electrons inside the conductor to move towards this charge, they will continue moving until the fields cancel out. I can see that this would also be true if an opposite charge was placed at the other side of the conductor. The electrons inside wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

But just because this is true does not mean that the fields on the right side of the conductor will act as if there is a mirror charge there.

I don't understand why a mirror charge is created. Will someone please explain?

Thanks.

Also, mini extra question:
How does this apply to antenna's? It's something to do with dipoles but I don't properly understand what is happening. If you could give an example of mirror charges being created in the context of an antenna It will be greatly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why does this happen?
It is the only solution with zero electric field everywhere inside and along the metal sheet. It is easy to see that it is a solution, and mathematics guarantees you that it is the only solution.
How does this apply to antenna's?
I don't see a relation to antennas.
 
Okay thanks, I think I study the maths in more detail next year. After that i'll probably be able to believe that it is the only solution :)

mfb said:
I don't see a relation to antennas.

A dipole antenna radiates an EM field because of the accelerating and decelerating charges inside of it. The electric field will be oscillating as it can not change at the same place everywhere at the same time (the wave front travels at c), and the magnetic field oscillates because a moving charge causes a magnetic field, and the charge is accelerating and decelerating in simple harmonic motion. This means at the point where acceleration is maximum and velocity is zero, there will be no magnetic field, and at the point where acceleration is minimum and velocity is maximum there will be maximum magnetic field.

What mirrored charges have to do with this:

In a dipole antenna the oscillating charges inside the antenna are reflected in the ground plane. This creates the dipole. The combination of the oscillating dipole charge, and the oscillating charge's in the antenna creates An EM wave.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/VFPt_dipole_animation_electric.gif
The fact that antennas work prove that these dipoles exist. Understanding them is important for antenna theory, it is the reason I asked this question. Just because a dipole is a solution to what caused the re distribution of charge inside the conductor shouldn't mean that it is actually there. Should it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still don't see a relation between moving charges in antennas and mirror charges in electrostatic setups.

Just because a dipole is a solution to what caused the re distribution of charge inside the conductor
There is no (interesting) dipole in the static setup. The mirror charge is imaginary.
 
Any induced charge on an object will not actually produce any net imbalance of charge. Any excess of - charges on one side of it must result in an excess of + charges on the other side, to compensate.
 
The mirror charge does not exist. It is used as an artefact that allows the field lines between the ground plane and the real charge to be calculated more readily. Essentially, the field lines between the real charge and the real ground plane are identical to the field lines between the charge and the mirror charge in that region, so one simply calculates the field lines between the real charge and the mirror charge (ignoring the real ground plane) to find the strength and shape of the field lines between the real charge and the real ground plane.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top