Why Are My Grades So Inconsistent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zill1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of achieving consistent grades in mathematics courses, particularly in Calculus and Linear Algebra. The individual shares their experience of fluctuating performance, having improved from a failing grade in pre-calculus to a 95% in Calculus II, while also encountering a significant drop in their first Linear Algebra exam. The conversation highlights that different courses cover varied material, which can affect performance. Factors influencing inconsistent grades include exam difficulty, personal understanding of the material, and preparation methods. The importance of maintaining a strong work ethic and focusing on learning rather than solely on grades is emphasized, suggesting that understanding the reasons behind grade fluctuations is crucial for improvement. Overall, perseverance and a solid foundation in the subject matter are key to future success.
Zill1
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
So a while ago I made a thread about how badly I did in pre-calculus. After failing I went back and ended with a B the second time. I got into Calculus I and failed with a redeemable failure (means I get to re-take my final) after studying my butt off; I did poorly on the final exam giving me a final grade of 49/100... so this spring I will re-write and hopefully do much better.

Anyway here I am now in Calculus II. I just got my midterm back and I ended up with a 95% on it. I have also written 2 exams for Linear Algebra. First one 45%. Second one 91%. I don't get it; I study the exact same way for everything I do but somehow I end up getting these weird grades... what the heck do I need to do to stay consistent?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess your thread is maybe about blowing off some steam since there aren't really any questions that anyone other than yourself can answer :p

From the marks you describe, I can see your frustrations - though you should consider that these courses are all different. Calculus may be calculus, but different topics are covered in I and II: it's also likely that the reason you did better in calculus II is because of the hard work you put into calculus I, the same applies to your linear algebra scores.

If you're worrying about consistency then try to break it down. Why did you get the 45% in Linear Algebra? Was the problem that things came up in the exam that you hadn't looked at? Did you have a lack of practice? Did you just find it difficult to understand the material?

There are obviously lots of factors that influence your test marks, until you feel you know what's affecting you, there isn't really much you can do to address it.

Otherwise, keep up the good work-ethic. Some people aren't great with exams - it happens - but if you put the work in, you've got a much better chance of ending up a capable student in later years when you've got such a solid foundation to work with.
 
Another question might be where you stood on each exam with respect to the class average. If you got a 45% and the class average was 30%, you probably did okay - the professor simply came up with an overly challenging exam. Then further down the road, he or she made a subsequent mid-term a little less challenging to bring up the average.
 
That happened with me in physics II. I would put tons of time in consistently and although the course was of uniform difficulty I would get A's on some midterms C/D's on the remaining ones. Its puzzling, the best thing you can do is don't get discouraged...try to focus on what you are learning, as opposed to your grades.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top