Why are some Maxwell relations written in reverse order?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the presentation of Maxwell relations in thermodynamics, specifically addressing the inversion of certain relations. The equation for Helmholtz free energy, dF = -SdT - PdV, leads to the relation (∂P/∂T)V = (∂S/∂V)T. However, some texts present the reciprocal relation (∂T/∂p)V,N = (∂V/∂S)T,N without adequate explanation. This inconsistency highlights a teaching gap in understanding exact differential relations and their reciprocals, which are equally valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic potentials, specifically Helmholtz free energy.
  • Familiarity with exact differential relations in thermodynamics.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications in thermodynamic equations.
  • Basic grasp of Maxwell relations and their significance in thermodynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Helmholtz free energy in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about the application of exact differential relations in various thermodynamic contexts.
  • Investigate the significance of reciprocal relations in Maxwell's equations.
  • Review educational resources that clarify the teaching of thermodynamic principles, focusing on exact differentials.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in engineering and physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and seeking to deepen their understanding of Maxwell relations and exact differentials.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
In thermodynamics, we always need to use exact differential relations to find the so called Maxwell relations. For a function of x and y, z=z(x,y)

if dz = M(x,y)dx + N(x, y)dy

the complete conditon for above equation to be hold is

\frac{\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial N}{\partial x}

Now, let see one of the relation on Helmholtz free energy

dF = -SdT - PdV

apply the condition mentioned above, we get

\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V = \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T

Well, in many materials (including some textbooks), they like to write it

\left ( {\partial T\over \partial p} \right )_{V,N} = \left ( {\partial V\over \partial S} \right )_{T,N}

I don't know why they like to inverse those relation! What interesting is only this relations I found to be in reverse order, the others Maxwells relations are just fine!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's absolutely no difference; the reciprocals of Maxwell relations are also valid. We can also get to this one by looking at the potential H=E+PV rather than F=E-TS. It is odd that some textbooks would switch just one without comment. It would be a good teaching opportunity to explain that this is OK.
 
this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_differential#Reciprocity_Relation
might be enlightening. I know it helped me. At the school I go to, most of the engineers or physics majors (same math requirement more or less) I have talked to don't really know about these rules. I'm pretty sure that means we were never taught them. It's kind of annoying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
973
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K