Why are steps not visible in the continuum limit of the Frenkel Kontorova model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Frenkel-Kontorova model, highlighting its discrete nature as a representation of many point particles. In transitioning to the continuum limit, the model approximates to the sine-Gordon equation, which smooths out the discrete steps into a continuous wave-like behavior. This means that in the continuum limit, the distinct steps observed in the discrete model vanish, as the system is treated as a continuous medium. The paper referenced illustrates that steps are inherently a feature of the discrete model, which cannot be captured in the continuum limit. Ultimately, the transition to a continuum eliminates the visibility of steps due to the averaging effect over an infinite number of particles.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
http://www.iop.kiev.ua/~obraun/fk-intro.htm#model

Question? Why this model is discreet? As far as I see particles can have any position?

Why then is written in the text then In the continuum-limit approximation we come to the sine-Gordon (SG) equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's discrete in the sense that it's a model of many point particles. You can take a continuum limit. E.g., as the most simple case you can model a string first as a chain of harmonically coupled point particles. The continuum limit leads to the wave equation for the string.
 
Thanks a lot for the answer.

And for example in this paper

http://fmc.unizar.es/people/juanjo/papers/falo93.pdf

steps appear because model is discrete. In continuum limit it would be impossible to see steps in the ##v(F)## (FIG 1). Is it possible to explain why in continuum limit is impossible to see steps?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top