Why are the calculated energies for two oscillating waves not equal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thuanthuan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of energy and displacement in wave interactions, highlighting a discrepancy between total mechanical energy and displacement equations. It points out that while the total energy of two waves can be expressed as (1/2)m.(w^2)(A1^2 + A2^2), the derived amplitude A from the displacement equation does not equate to the sum of the individual amplitudes squared. Additionally, the conversation shifts to light behavior in a thin film of glass, questioning whether minimizing light loss requires destructive interference of reflected waves. The consensus suggests that for maximum transmission of light back to air, destructive interference of the reflected waves is indeed necessary. This indicates a complex interplay between wave mechanics and optics in understanding energy propagation and light behavior.
thuanthuan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have a question about waves.

Suppose there are two waves that make one water atom vibrate.
The first equation of oscillation is: x1= A1sin(wt+p1), energy propagated to the atom is (1/2)m.(w^2)(A1^2)
and the other: x2=A2sin(wt+p2), E2 = (1/2)m.(w^2)(A2^2)
so the total energy (mechanical) of the atom is (1/2)m.(w^2)(A1^2+A2^2)

On the other hand, the total displacement is x=x1+x2=A(sinwt+p), where A=A1^2+A2^2-2A1A2cos(p1-p2)
so the energy = (1/2)m.(w^2)(A^2)

but A^2 doesn't equal to A1^2+A2^2

so the two energy calculated are not equal

what's wrong with my calculation ?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A similar question, Suppose we have a thin film of glass with an index of diffraction is n
The upper and lower surfaces of the flim is parellel. Light is incident to the flim.

So a portion of light is reflected at the upper surface, the rest is refracted into glass. Light continues to the lower surface, then one portion of it is refracted back into air, one portion is reflected.

Someone say that to minimize the light loss due to reflection (that is, the final light traveling back to the air is maximized), then two reflected line must destructively interfere with each other. Is that true ? Can you explain why ?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top