wasteofo2
- 477
- 2
Does anyone know why the public 9/11 hearings have a time limit, when the same people testified privately for much longer?
Since they are just a political exercise (like a debate), everything about their conduct gets negotiated in advance.wasteofo2 said:Does anyone know why the public 9/11 hearings have a time limit, when the same people testified privately for much longer?
russ_watters said:Since they are just a political exercise (like a debate), everything about their conduct gets negotiated in advance.
I didn't mean they were exactly like debates, just that there are similarities - kat has a good point, they are also like most other things done on the floor of Congress: everything anyone says is a speach designed to generate soundbytes for their campaign. And yeah, its often funny when a question doesn't get answered the way the questioner wants it: the questioner often ends up with their foot in their mouth and tail between their legs.wasteofo2 said:The people answering the questions may be given them earlier (if that's what you meant), but it seems that a lot of the people on the pannel had to drop points that they didn't get answered satisfactorily.
wasteofo2 said:Does anyone know why the public 9/11 hearings have a time limit, when the same people testified privately for much longer?