Why Can Mechanical Waves Propagate Through a Medium?

AI Thread Summary
Mechanical waves propagate through a medium due to the interactions between particles, specifically attraction or repulsion, and their ability to vibrate around an equilibrium position. The discussion clarifies that while particles always vibrate, they do not experience net displacement after a wave passes, which is why option c) is incorrect. The analogy of particles as masses connected by springs illustrates how disturbances can transfer energy through the medium. It is emphasized that waves can occur in gases, but the focus is on the vibrations of particles rather than their interactions. Ultimately, the correct understanding is that the particles return to their original positions after disturbance, confirming that only options b) and c) are valid in the context of wave propagation.
eureka_beyond
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a general concept question. The problem is, I don't seem to understand what the question is saying and why. Here's the question:

A mechanical wave can propagate through a medium if

a) there are attraction/ repulsion between the medium particles
b) the particles are able to vibrate about their equilibrium position
c) the particles have a net displacement when they are subjected to disturbance

Only a) and b) are correct, but why?:confused:

Thanks! =]

Homework Equations



no equations

The Attempt at a Solution



To be specific, I don't understand how there are attraction or repulsion between particles. Then I don't understand how is the vibration of particles important when they are in their equilibrium position. Thirdly, why is c) incorrect. I'm totally confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 - Imagine that the particles are like masses and their interaction is like springs attached to them (this is a simple model). If you excite the system by kicking the 1st mass for example, its motion will excite the 2nd mass to move, which will make the 3rd one to move and so on.
If there is no interaction, i.e. attraction or repulsion, it will be an ideal gas. But wave propagating through gas is another story. I guess the question doesn't apply to gas (though wave through gas is mechanical wave), because the answers focus on the vibration of each particle.
2 - They actually always vibrate. Answer (b) means the particles can vibrate, not be in free motion like gas.
3 - I guess answer (c) means the wave makes the equilibrium position change. You know, when vibrating, particles only vibrates about its equilibrium position, so after one period or when the vibration stops, it comes back to the same position, which means no net displacement. But it's just my speculation.
 
No, the correct answer is NOT (a) and (b), it is (b) and (c). Water waves, for example, occur because, after disturbance, each water "particle" is returned to its position by gravity. There is no "attraction/ repulsion between the medium particles".
 
Ah~ I better correct the answer in my exercise book. Now I get it why a) is incorrect and why b) is correct. But I'm still having few concerns with c). After disturbance, the particles return to their original position, so there's no net displacement. c) saids there is. So i guess c) must be discribing the situation where during disturbance, there are some particles which does have displacement, and so there is net displacement. It's talking about all the particles as a whole rather than any particular one. Am I right? Or am I just making it more complicated?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top