Why Can't Barium Be Electroplated onto Copper?

AI Thread Summary
Barium cannot be electroplated onto copper primarily due to its high reactivity and the instability of barium ions in aqueous solutions, which leads to the formation of barium hydroxide rather than a stable plating. Additionally, the electrochemical potential of barium is more negative than that of copper, making it thermodynamically unfavorable to deposit barium onto copper through electroplating. The discussion emphasizes that attempts to solve the question must be presented to receive assistance, adhering to forum policies. Overall, the challenges of electroplating barium stem from its chemical properties and the conditions required for successful deposition. Understanding these factors is crucial for addressing the exam question effectively.
matthew77ask
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I saw an exam question that ask the students to explain the process of electoplate barium onto a piece of copper rod

Can some body help me to explain why is it not possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure it is not possible in general, for sure it is not possible in water solution.

Please note you have to show your attempts at solving the question to receive help. This is a forum policy.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top