Why Can't Information Travel Faster Than Light Without Breaking Causality?

alpha_wolf
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's based on Special Relativity -- information traveling faster than c breaks cause an effect.

The basic geometric cause of the paradox is this: If, in one reference frame, information travels from point A to point B, then there are other reference frames in which the same piece of information travels from point B to point A.

That is, when information is transmitted faster than c, it is impossible to tell the difference between the source and the destination!

With a little care, you can arrange fun paradoxes, such as FTL transmission of information that's "supposed" to from A to B then back to A, but it arrives back at A before it was ever sent! Thus it is said to violate causality -- it violates the "law" cause and effect.
 
alpha_wolf said:
"Information cannot travel faster than c"
"If information could travel faster than c, we would loose causality"
Just wandering - who came up with these and why? In other words:
1. Why can't information travel at some higher finite speed?
2. Why would we loose causality in that case?

Note that I'm posting here in the relativity forum, since I suspect this has much to do with relativity... Was this Einstein's idea?

This may or may not answer your question, but this paper is barely 2 weeks old...

http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1

Zz.
 
information cannot travel faster then c because we would loose causality...This is a consequence of the special theory of relativity where c is postulated to be constant for all observers. This was an idea from Einstein.

Loosing causlity is not allowed because this is not physical. It means that the consequence of some action can occur before the actual action... Something like you die before you are born...this is crazy talk, wouldn't you say?

marlon
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top