Why can't logs have a negative base?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rumplestiltskin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Negative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why logarithms cannot have a negative base, exploring both theoretical and practical implications. Participants examine the mathematical reasoning behind logarithmic functions and the challenges posed by negative bases, including syntax errors encountered in calculators and the nature of real versus complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that taking logs of negative numbers is impossible because no number raised to any power yields a negative result, leading to questions about negative bases.
  • One participant proposes that log-10(100) = 2 could be rewritten as -10^2 = 100, but others challenge this interpretation, emphasizing the importance of order of operations.
  • Another participant points out that using a negative base in logarithms complicates the definition of a real-valued exponential function.
  • Some participants express confusion over syntax errors encountered when attempting to calculate logarithms with negative bases, noting that calculators return complex numbers instead.
  • There is mention of specific calculations, such as log-10(50) and log-10(x) = 1.7, which lead to further discussion about the implications of negative bases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of negative bases in logarithms. While some agree on the complications introduced by negative bases, others continue to explore the implications and express confusion regarding calculations and definitions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of negative bases and the distinction between real and complex numbers in logarithmic functions. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding about order of operations and the nature of logarithmic calculations.

Rumplestiltskin
Messages
97
Reaction score
3
I understand that taking logs of a negative number isn't possible because no number to any power produces a negative number. But why not a negative base?
Say, log-10(100) = 2. Rewritten, -102 = 100, which is accurate.
You could suggest that you may as well just ignore the negative because -x2 = x2, but it's still weird that this shows up as a syntax error on a calculator.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try to calculate log-10(50)=x.
Or, alternatively, solve log-10(x)=1.7. What is x=(-10)1.7?

For integers (with the right sign) as logarithm values, it would work, but only for those.
 
Rumplestiltskin said:
I understand that taking logs of a negative number isn't possible because no number to any power produces a negative number. But why not a negative base?
Say, log-10(100) = 2. Rewritten, -102 = 100, which is accurate.
No, it isn't. ##-10^2 = - 100## because the exponent has a higher precedence than the negation sign. What you probably meant was ##(-10)^2##, which is 100.
Rumplestiltskin said:
You could suggest that you may as well just ignore the negative because -x2 = x2, but it's still weird that this shows up as a syntax error on a calculator.
For the reason given above, ##-x^2 \ne x^2##, unless x happens to be 0. If you want to square a negative number on a calculator, put parentheses around the number, with the exponent outside the parentheses.
 
Moved from Homework sections, as this is more of a general question than a homework question. @Rumplestiltskin, be advised that if you post in the HW sections, youi need to use the homework template, not delete it as you apparently did.
 
Rumplestiltskin said:
I understand that taking logs of a negative number isn't possible because no number to any power produces a negative number. But why not a negative base?
Say, log-10(100) = 2. Rewritten, -102 = 100, which is accurate.
You could suggest that you may as well just ignore the negative because -x2 = x2, but it's still weird that this shows up as a syntax error on a calculator.
You should be more careful regarding order of operations.

-102 = -100

and

-x2 = - (x2)

I assume you meant to write

(-10)2 = 100

and

(-x)2 = x2The main problem with having a negative base in a logarithm, is that there is a problem defining a real valued exponential function having a negative base.
 
mfb said:
Try to calculate log-10(50)=x.
Or, alternatively, solve log-10(x)=1.7. What is x=(-10)1.7?

For integers (with the right sign) as logarithm values, it would work, but only for those.

Syntax error on calculator. When typed into google, (-10)1.7 = 29.4590465 - 40.5468989 i. Woah. Still at a loss.
SammyS said:
The main problem with having a negative base in a logarithm, is that there is a problem defining a real valued exponential function having a negative base.

Could you elaborate?
 
Rumplestiltskin said:
Syntax error on calculator. When typed into google, (-10)1.7 = 29.4590465 - 40.5468989 i. Woah. Still at a loss.Could you elaborate?
That's a complex number. Isn't that a problem for a real function?

Try (-10)π .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K