Why cant u go to outer space like an upwards climbing roller coaster?

AI Thread Summary
The concept of floating in space like an upward-climbing roller coaster is flawed, as Earth's gravity extends infinitely and never fully releases its hold. Achieving orbit requires significant speed, especially at low Earth orbit, which is only 150 miles above the surface. The idea of a skyhook is theoretical, but current materials and technology are insufficient to construct one. Even at geostationary orbit, approximately 24,000 miles up, gravity still exerts a strong influence. The discussion highlights the complexities of escaping Earth's gravitational pull and the challenges of space travel.
eratosthenes2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
when you reach that part 'which the Earth can no longer hold onto you'.. wouldn't u just climb up and then bam.. your floating?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sure, the idea is called a skyhook, but we don't have the materials to build one.
 
We have enough trouble building half quarter mile tall structures!

Note also - this only works for geostationary orbit, which is an altitude of around 24,000 miles. Low Earth orbit is a paltry 150 miles, and at that low altitude, the speed of the orbit is by far the main energy requirement.
 
eratosthenes2 said:
when you reach that part 'which the Earth can no longer hold onto you'.. wouldn't u just climb up and then bam.. your floating?
There is no place in which "earth can no longer hold on to you." Earth's gravity extends out to infinity. Gravity is an inverse square law, which means that gravitational acceleration is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance to the center of the Earth. For example, the gravitational force on those astronauts you see on TV floating around in the space station is more-or-less the same as the force they are subject to when standing on the surface of the Earth -- specifically, its about 90% of the Earth-bound force.
 
DaleSpam said:
Sure, the idea is called a skyhook, but we don't have the materials to build one.

It'd be awesome if we did...
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top