Why can't we make a space elevator using Quantum Levitation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of constructing a space elevator using quantum levitation with stacked hollow rings. Participants question the structural integrity of such an elevator, noting that while quantum locking allows for movement, it may not support significant weight. The concepts of quantum levitation and the Meissner effect are explored, particularly regarding their limitations in lifting heavy objects. There is speculation about increasing energy output to enhance lifting capabilities, but concerns remain about the necessary scale of magnetic platforms and the behavior of superconductors in this context. Overall, the conversation highlights the theoretical challenges and practical limitations of using quantum levitation for a space elevator.
Troy Barnes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why can't we make a space elevator out of separate rings that are stacked over each other through Quantum Levitation?
You know, have hollow rings that are quantum locked over each other, like in this video That way, the ladder freely moves around and changes shape, but would still be "intact". Transporting something would be done by putting it in a magnetic capsule, and then using super conductivity to get it all the way up the ladder? I have zero experience in anything space so bear with me..
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Look how easily you can remove the superconductor from the magnet. I don't think an elevator would hold together.
 
What does "quantum locked" and "quantum levitation" mean? And if you mean magnetic levitation, possibly involving the Meissner effect, what makes you think this supports an arbitrary amount of weight?
 
Hello! Found this thread through interest and some research into the matter.

Isn't it possible to increase the energy output into magnets, and thus you would "push"/"lift" the object upwards? (I personally have no idea, this is merely a hypothetical theory)

There is distance between the superconducting object and the magnetic platform after all... so it is a question of proportions, is it not? How big would you have to build a magnetic platform to be capable of "lifting" something out into space, using this technology? Furthermore, is the superconducting object "weightless" in the state of quantum trapping/locking?

If, for instance, we say that we have a superconducting object hovering above 1 square meters of a magnetic platform, and there's 100 square meters underground/under a door/surface/gate. Would the magnetic force be greater if one would open the gate 1 square meter? Or 2 square meters? Would it cause the superconducting object to rise, or would it stay "locked" in position?

EDIT: I would suggest checking out more information about the matter on TEDTalks with Boaz Almog.
http://www.ted.com/talks/boaz_almog_levitates_a_superconductor#
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Thread 'Can the signal WOW be explained by the maser effect?'

This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
View full post »

Similar threads

Space Elevators -> US Transportation Infrastructure
Replies
23
Views
6K
I About quantum interference: space and time
Replies
30
Views
2K
A How to derive Quantum Mechanics in curved physical space?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Can the Worldwide Web be a Platform for Philosophical Discourse and Debate?
Replies
2
Views
426
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
Replies
25
Views
5K
B Is the Big Bang Just an Event in an Existing Space/Time Fabric?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Why does quantum mechanics believe that gravity is a field?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Intuition for why linear algebra is needed in quantum physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Does this thought experiment show that Space must be curved?
Replies
17
Views
2K
Can a Sphere Be Levitated Using Magnets and Rings, Despite Earnshaw's Theorem?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top