Why Did Our Geophysical Group Use a L&N Bridge Instead of a Slide-Wire Bridge?

AI Thread Summary
A geophysical group in Yuma, Arizona, utilized a Leeds and Northrup (L&N) bridge instead of a slide-wire bridge for measuring soil resistance in their search for water. The L&N bridge offers greater accuracy, which is crucial in geophysical measurements. Additionally, its portability is advantageous for fieldwork in challenging environments. The potential for thermal expansion and contraction in the slide-wire bridge could lead to inaccuracies in data due to high summer temperatures. Overall, the choice of the L&N bridge was driven by the need for precision and reliability in the hot climate.
hamburgler
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
My teacher gave us this problem to work on:

Homework Statement


Some years ago I worked with a geophysical group that was looking for water in the Yuma Arizona area. Boy what it hot! Because of the high temperatures in the summer, water was badly needed in large amounts to irrigate crops. Our crew inserted probes in the soil over large areas so we could measure the resistance of the soil and hopefully find water. The instrument that we used in this research was a Leeds and Northrup unit just like the one you used in your experiment. We did not use a slide-wire bridge. Give three reasons why a professional crew like I have described used a L&N bridge rather than the slide-wire bridge.

2. The attempt at a solution

1. A L&D bridge is far more accurate than a slide-wire bridge is in this situation.
2. It is more portable.
3. The heat may cause the wire in the slide-wire bridge to shrink/expand and cause discrepancies in the data.


The last two are just shots in the dark because I can't think of anything else beyond accuracy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one?
 
Please? lol
 
I think 1) is because of 3) which is the correct answer. I am not very sure what an L&D bridge is though. I assumed they consisted of the arrangement of resistor boxes usually seen in labs.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top