Why did you choose math over physics or vice versa?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons individuals choose to study mathematics or physics, exploring personal preferences, perceptions of each field, and the relationship between the two disciplines. Participants share their experiences and thoughts on the nature of mathematics and physics, including their applications and theoretical foundations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that physics is intertwined with mathematics, suggesting one cannot study one without the other, while others challenge this notion, asserting that many areas of mathematics are independent of physics.
  • Several participants describe their preference for mathematics due to its perceived purity and perfection, contrasting it with physics, which they view as messy or less aesthetically pleasing.
  • Some participants highlight the practical applications of engineering, suggesting it requires knowledge of both mathematics and physics, and argue that engineering is more challenging due to its applied nature.
  • There are discussions about the historical overlap between mathematics and physics, with references to how discoveries in one field have influenced the other.
  • Participants reflect on their personal experiences with both fields, noting that while physics may seem more naturally appealing, mathematics offers a different kind of beauty and depth.
  • One participant mentions their introspection regarding applying to graduate school in either field, weighing the perceived purity of mathematics against the practical nature of physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no consensus on the relationship between mathematics and physics. While some agree on the beauty of mathematics and the messiness of physics, others challenge these views, leading to a contested discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal aesthetic preferences and subjective experiences, which may not universally apply. The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of mathematics and physics that remain unexamined.

  • #31
Wastrophysicist said:
I think Mathematics was discovered/invented because of the study of the world.

Almost. Much like early writing, math's origins are in the exceedingly dull and practical world of counting and measuring for property and taxation. Early societies didn't have the luxury of doing science, but they did want land and money (in the form form of livestock and such). The Egyptians and Babylonians did figure out that math could be fun and put a few recreational problems in their teaching material, but mostly it was the Greeks who took it to the next level of abstraction.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint, Logical Dog and fresh_42
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I thought briefly about becoming a math major. But I decided to major in physics because I liked science fiction when I was growing up, and I was fascinated by space travel, radioactivity, nuclear power, lasers, SETI, gravity, relativity, particle accelerators, time travel, warp drives, transporters, antimatter, electron microscopes, holography, and so on.

I saw that physicists got to build and work with amazing devices. I love the way physics allows us to uncover nature's secrets so that the world is no longer so mysterious, and we can control it to some extent. By the time I was at university I also hoped that physics would answer the whole "meaning of life" question or at least enable us to contact aliens who know more than we do.

As for the whole beauty thing, that is not my motivation, but I do admit I am attracted to equations that can explain nature and in fact even looking at equations is a bit of an emotional experience. Consider Maxwell's equations, for example. Even the symbols are beautiful. Writing them is such a pleasure. I particularly like calculus and differential equations. This is one reason I don't like working with computers even though I must at times. I miss that hands-on experience of writing equations or drawing diagrams with a pen or pencil.

I enjoy pure math to some extent, but I really only care about math because it is the language of physics. I don't like solving puzzles just as an intellectual exercise. In other words in physics I get the thrill that comes from knowledge, but not just any knowledge. It's the knowledge that leads to nuclear power, for example.

To sum up, I want to understand how nature works and at least to some extent get control over it and bend it to my will.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
  • #33
Wastrophysicist said:
I think Mathematics was discovered/invented because of the study of the world.
I am not well informed about such history but even if that's true, it doesn't change the fact that today you can study math without knowing physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #34
blue_leaf77 said:
I am not well informed about such history but even if that's true, it doesn't change the fact that today you can study math without knowing physics.

As I said, math was invented for accounting. Fortunately you can study math without that too. :D

-Dave K
 
  • #35
dkotschessaa said:
As I said, math was invented for accounting. Fortunately you can study math without that too. :D

-Dave K
My personal understatement of the day!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dkotschessaa
  • #36
dkotschessaa said:
As I said, math was invented for accounting. Fortunately you can study math without that too. :D

-Dave K
Indeed hahah. But remember Physics is an excellent source of inspiration for Mathematics. You can study Mathematics without Physics, of course, but the study of Physics lead to branches such as Calculus, many contributions in Topology, etc...

Quoting Pierre Bergé, Des rythmes au chaos: " For some results or discoveries, it is difficult to say to which area they belong: to the Mathematics or to physics." If a mathematician finds a result that could belong to Physics, but has no prior knowledge on it, well, he/she may mix both areas, and some Physics may be required.

For studying Mathematics you don't need Physics at all, but for every Mathematician, I'll encourage to have the very basics of Physics while doing research. You don't know what you can find...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K