Why didn't water entere the bottle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scientifico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
Water did not enter the overturned bottle submerged in 0.5 meters of water due to the balance of pressure inside and outside the bottle. The external pressure consists of both air pressure and water pressure, while the internal pressure is just the air. At this depth, the pressure difference is insufficient to compress the air significantly, limiting water entry. Although some water may enter, the amount is minimal because the air pressure inside the bottle resists further water intrusion. Thus, the primary reason for the lack of water entering the bottle is the limited pressure differential at that depth.
scientifico
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I put an overturned bottle inside a container filled with 0.5 m of water but water didn't enter inside the bottle.
Pressure acting out the bottle when is immersed is air pressure plus water pressure at its height and pressure inside bottle is just air so why didn't water entered the bottle ? Is it about gravity ?

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


scientifico said:
Hi,

I put an overturned bottle inside a container filled with 0.5 m of water but water didn't enter inside the bottle.
Pressure acting out the bottle when is immersed is air pressure plus water pressure at its height and pressure inside bottle is just air so why didn't water entered the bottle ? Is it about gravity ?

Thank you
Air is compressible. Some water will enter the bottle, but not more than the water pressure allows with respect to the pressure and volume inside the bottle. 0.5m down in the water the pressure is only 1.049 bar, and the air above waterlevel is 1 bar. A difference of only 4.9%. However, you should see that some water enter the bottle.

Water pressure is a function of its mass and gravity. The deeper you go, the more mass are above you, the higher the pressure. If you submerge the bottle deep enough the pressure will fill the bottle with water almost completely. But still there is the same mass of air inside - just compressed into a very small space.
 


So doesn't enter much water at 0.5 m because water compress air increasing its pressure ?
 


scientifico said:
So doesn't enter much water at 0.5 m because water compress air increasing its pressure ?

Not much water enters because 0.5 meters worth of pressure does not compress the air very much.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top