Why displacement equals (average a) x (t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter V0ODO0CH1LD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement
Click For Summary
Displacement can be understood as the product of average velocity and time, particularly when dealing with constant acceleration. A body with a constant acceleration of 1 m/s² displaces the same distance as one moving at a constant velocity of 0.5 m/s over specific time intervals, such as 0 or 1 second. This equivalence arises because the average velocity during acceleration matches the constant velocity when time is appropriately set. The relationship holds true as the body accelerates to 0.5 m/s and then maintains that average speed over the time interval. Ultimately, the average velocity remains consistent when time is adjusted to reflect the acceleration's effect.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
I get the proof with the velocity as a function of time graphic.

I don't get why that is...

E.G.

Why does something with a constant acceleration of (1m/s)/s gets displaced the same as something with a constant velocity of .5m/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V0ODO0CH1LD said:
Why does something with a constant acceleration of (1m/s)/s gets displaced the same as something with a constant velocity of .5m/s?
That's only true for a specific amount of time, in this case 0 or 1 seconds, zero because no movement occurs, and 1 second because average velocity for the constant acceleration will be .5 m/s. At any other time, the average velocity and displacement will not be the same.
 
rcgldr said:
That's only true for a specific amount of time, in this case 0 or 1 seconds, zero because no movement occurs, and 1 second because average velocity for the constant acceleration will be .5 m/s. At any other time, the average velocity and displacement will not be the same.

Yeah, I realized that only after I posted...

But it still doens't answer the question of why that is..

Is it because the body spends the same amount of time accelerating towards the velocity of .5m/s as it spends accelerating away from it? And all of that at the same rate?

So it kind of compansates and adds up to the velocity which the body accelarates around?
 
Yes. You are comparing vt with at2/2, so cancelling out one t means we are comparing v to at/2. Note that at is the final v, so if v starts out zero, then at/2 is the same thing as the average speed over the time interval t. So you will always have the same average v if you set t such that v = at/2.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
595
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
629
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
731
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K