Why do 2 balls bounce in a Newton's Cradle instead of just one?

AI Thread Summary
In a Newton's Cradle, when one ball is lifted and released, it transfers its momentum and energy to the next ball, resulting in one ball bouncing out on the opposite side. When two balls are lifted and released, both balls impact the stationary balls, causing two balls to bounce out due to the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy. This phenomenon occurs because elastic collisions ensure that the total momentum and kinetic energy before and after the collision remain constant. If only one ball were to bounce out after two balls were released, it would violate the conservation laws, leading to an incorrect kinetic energy calculation. The mechanics of Newton's Cradle illustrate fundamental principles of physics that apply to various scenarios, including billiards.
Yuc4h
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

There is this device called Newton's Cradle

http://www.heurekashop.fi/files/magneetti/productpics/496picture2Upload.jpg

You lift one ball and let it impact with other balls, the impact is followed by other ball bouncing from the other side.

However, when you lift 2 balls, the impact is followed by 2 other balls bouncing. Why is that? I would initially guess that only one ball bounces, the answer can not be very simple since I actually asked a professor of physics about this and he didn't really know the answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer is that this involves elastic collisions where no deformation occurs. Both kinetic energy and momentum are conserved. When you satisfy both conditions, you get 1 ball = 1 ball, 2 balls = 2 balls, etc as the only possible solution.
 
But also 2 balls = 1 ball would satisfy the conditions if the ball would get twice the momentum and it also would make more sense.
 
Yuc4h said:
But also 2 balls = 1 ball would satisfy the conditions if the ball would get twice the momentum and it also would make more sense.
How would that conserve energy? And why would it make more sense?
 
Both conditions have to be satisfied. If you have 2 balls, each of mass m, moving with velocity v before the collision, the combined momentum is 2mv and the combined kinetic energy is mv^2. After the collision, these must still be true.
If you had only one ball leaving, its momentum would have to be 2 mv. Since its mass is m, its velocity must be 2v. However, that would make the kinetic energy 2mv^2. So, this cannot be a solution.
This is a standard problem in Physics. The solution is well known and accepted. Thousands (millions?) of students have played with Newton's cradles and tried to get a different result. All have failed.
If this solution were not true, it would be impossible to play the game of pool (billiards) as we know it.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top