Why do all three quantum models only consider positive quantum numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xmflea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores why the ground state quantum numbers differ among models, with the particle in a box and particle on a ring using n=1 for their ground states, while the harmonic oscillator uses n=0. It highlights that the "zero of energy" for the harmonic oscillator is at the bottom of its potential, making negative energy states unphysical. The impossibility of having energies lower than the potential throughout all space is emphasized, as it contradicts the principles of quantum mechanics. Additionally, the nature of wavefunctions and their derivatives is examined, showing that normalizable wavefunctions cannot exist in entirely classically forbidden regions. Overall, negative quantum numbers are not considered due to these fundamental constraints in quantum mechanics.
xmflea
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Why conceptually, does the ground state for the particle in the box model correspond to n=1 while for the harmonic oscillator and the particle on a ring model it is n=0? For all three models, why don't we consider negative quantum numbers?


attempt:...the particle in a box and particle on ring use the quantum number n in the equation to solve the time independent diff-eq. and n=1 and n=1 correspond to ground state levels...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Conventionally, the "zero of energy" is the bottom of the parabolic potential, i.e. the potential is zero at x = 0. If the energy is negative, it is lower than the potential everywhere in space. If you use the Schrodinger equation to find the second derivative of the wavefunction, you will see that the second derivative is positive everywhere in space. Now try drawing a few wavefunctions for, say, the ground state that (a) have a positive second derivative everywhere and (b) are normalizable.

In general, it is impossible to have energies that are lower than the potential everywhere in space. Quantum mechanics allows particles to be in "classically forbidden" regions, but not if the entire space available to the particle is classically forbidden.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top