Why do different formulae give me different answers for mass of galaxy?

AI Thread Summary
Different formulas yield varying mass estimates for the galaxy due to discrepancies in the values used for the Sun's radial velocity and orbital period. The first calculation, based on centripetal force, gives a mass of approximately 1.7 x 10^41 kg, while the second method using Kepler's Third Law results in about 7.1 x 10^10 solar masses, equivalent to 1.4 x 10^41 kg. The third approach, also employing Kepler’s Law, estimates the mass at 1.3 x 10^41 kg. The variations arise from the different assumptions and parameters, particularly the radial velocity, which affects the calculations significantly. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate coursework explanations.
anyaxo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to calculate the mass of the galaxy within the orbit of the sun.

M = Mass of the galaxy = ?
r = ‘Distance of sun from galactic centre = 7.6 kpc’ = 2.3 x 1017 km = 2.3 x 1020 m (2 sf)
G = Gravitational constant = 6.67 x 10-11 Nm2kg-2
v = ‘Radial velocity of the sun = 220,000 ms-2’

Since the Sun’s orbit around the galactic centre is nearly circular, it undergoes circular motion and experiences a centripetal force:

〖mv〗^2/r = - GMm/r^2

v^2 = GM/r
M= ((220,000)^2 (2.3 ×〖10〗^20))/(6.67 ×〖10〗^(-11) )
=1.7 × 〖10〗^41 kg (2 significant figures)
Using Newton's form of Kepler's Third Law..

r = ‘distance of sun from galactic centre = 1.6 x 109 AU (Astronomical Units)’ 13
T = ‘orbital period of the sun = 2.4 x 108 Julian Years’
M = Mass of galaxy = ?

M= r^3/T^2

M= 〖(1.6 × 〖10〗^9)〗^3/〖(2.4 ×〖10〗^8)〗^2

M=7.1 × 〖10〗^10 M_ʘ

This proves that if every star has approximately the mass of the sun, there are approximately 7.1 x 10^10 stars in the Milky Way.

7.1 x 10^10 Mʘ = 1.4 x 10^41 kg (2 significant figures)

Finally, by using the original form of Kepler’s Third Law we can also obtain the mass of a galaxy.

T = ‘orbital period of the sun = 2.4 x 108 Julian Years’ 15 = 7.57 x 1015 seconds
r = ‘distance of sun from galactic centre = 2.3 x 1017 km’ 13= 2.3 x 1020 m
G = Gravitational constant = 6.67 x 10-11 Nm2kg-2

T^2=(〖4π〗^2/GM)r^3

M= (4π^2 r^3)/(GT^2 )

M= (4 × π^2 ×〖(2.3 × 〖10〗^20)〗^3)/((6.67 × 〖10〗^(-11) ) 〖(7.57 × 〖10〗^15)〗^2 )

M = 1.3 x 10^41 kg (2 significant figures)

Why are my three answers (all in bold) so different? and which one is correct and why? I need to explain this for my coursework!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using your values for R and T, I get v = 2πr/T = 1.91 x 10^5 m/s, which is not the same as the 220,000 m/s you use in the first calc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top