Why Do Different Semiconductors Exhibit Varied Transmittance Levels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter says
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bandgap
AI Thread Summary
Different semiconductors exhibit varied transmittance levels primarily due to their distinct bandgaps, which determine their ability to transmit or absorb light at specific wavelengths. The bandgap is influenced by the atomic composition and crystalline structure of the materials. Reflectance in semiconductors is also affected by these factors, and anti-reflective coatings (ARCs) can be applied to reduce reflectance and enhance transmittance, thereby improving solar cell efficiency. ARCs are designed to target specific wavelength ranges where a semiconductor has high reflectance. Understanding these properties is essential for optimizing semiconductor applications in energy technologies.
says
Messages
585
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


I recently completed an experiment where I measured the transmittance of a set of samples (different semiconductors). I'm trying to understand why the transmittance was different for different samples. Only just started learning some solid-state physics.

The spectrum (I think it was Voltage [y-axis] vs. Wavelength [x-axis])

The Transmittance of the surface of a material/semiconductor is its effectiveness in transmitting radiant energy.

The bandgap of a semiconductor is the minimum energy required to excite an electron that is stuck in its bound state into a free state where it can participate in conduction.

So the transmittance of different semiconductors is different because they have different bandgaps. Is that correct to infer that?

If so, I'm wondering how different materials have different bandgaps? Is it purely because of their crystalline structure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
says said:

Homework Statement


I recently completed an experiment where I measured the transmittance of a set of samples (different semiconductors). I'm trying to understand why the transmittance was different for different samples. Only just started learning some solid-state physics.

The spectrum (I think it was Voltage [y-axis] vs. Wavelength [x-axis])

The Transmittance of the surface of a material/semiconductor is its effectiveness in transmitting radiant energy.

The bandgap of a semiconductor is the minimum energy required to excite an electron that is stuck in its bound state into a free state where it can participate in conduction.

So the transmittance of different semiconductors is different because they have different bandgaps. Is that correct to infer that?

If so, I'm wondering how different materials have different bandgaps? Is it purely because of their crystalline structure?
Yes, different semiconductors have different bandgaps. They transmit light at longer wavelengths and absorb light with wavelenghts shorter than the one corresponding to the bandgap. The bandgap of different materials depend both on the atoms/molecules they consist of and their crystalline structure.
 
  • Like
Likes says
What about the reflectance of a semiconductor? Is that also due to bandgap? Or just atoms they are made of, crystalline structure and anti-reflective coating?
 
Everything has some reflectance. Highly absorbing materials also have high reflectance. The reflectance can be calculated from the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index, and it also depends on the composition and structure of the material.
Reflectance can be reduced by anti-reflection coatings.
 
Different semiconductors have different reflectance based on their composition and crystalline structure. So it is beneficial for a solar cell to have anti-reflective coating (ARC) because it reduces the number of reflections and increases the transmittance and absorption, which increases the efficiency of a solar cell?

If a semiconductor is known to reflect light of a certain wavelength range can an ARC be then placed over the semiconductor to reduce the reflectance at that specific wavelength range? i.e. If a semiconductor has high reflectance from say 600 - 800 nm, an ARC can be placed on the semiconductor that reduces the reflections at this wavelength range.
 
says said:
Different semiconductors have different reflectance based on their composition and crystalline structure. So it is beneficial for a solar cell to have anti-reflective coating (ARC) because it reduces the number of reflections and increases the transmittance and absorption, which increases the efficiency of a solar cell?
Yes, reflection means loss of the intensity of the light entering into the solar cell.
says said:
If a semiconductor is known to reflect light of a certain wavelength range can an ARC be then placed over the semiconductor to reduce the reflectance at that specific wavelength range? i.e. If a semiconductor has high reflectance from say 600 - 800 nm, an ARC can be placed on the semiconductor that reduces the reflections at this wavelength range.
Yes, an ARC coating works in a certain wavelength range. That range must be the same as the working range of the solar cell.
 
  • Like
Likes says
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top