Why do filaments of bulbs heat up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why the filament of a bulb heats up, specifically through the interactions of electrons with metal atoms and ions. It clarifies that in conductors, electrons are not completely removed but rather become delocalized, allowing them to move freely within the metal. The confusion arises between the terms "metal ions" and "metal atoms," with a distinction made that electrons collide with metal atoms rather than fully ionized metal ions. The explanation emphasizes that while ions are charged particles, the metal itself remains neutral, with only some electrons being freed from their respective atoms. This understanding is crucial for grasping the microscopic processes involved in the heating of a filament.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


This is not entirely a homework question but more a question about a homework assignment. We were asked to find out why a filament of a bulb heats up by talking about microscopic ideas. This is a link to a website that contains the relevant information under the heading 'higher tier only'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/add_aqa/electricity/resistancerev4.shtml

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I just wanted to ask if the electrons collide with metal IONS or metal ATOMS. I have found other sources that have said the electrons collide with the metal atoms and surely only one is correct. I thought a metal ion is when an atom has completely had an electron removed. I thought conductors just have electrons that are free to drift rather than electrons that have been completely removed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The metal atoms are ionized in the metal. Their outermost electrons leave their parent atoms and belong to the whole metal, moving about freely.
Ion is a charged particle, it contains more or less electrons than there are protons in the nucleus. The metal is usually neutral, the electrons are not completely removed from it, they are removed only from the atoms.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top