Why do I have to use integration and components?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
Mariah
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


in the picture.

Homework Equations


F=ILcrossB
Along with the original question, the other picture contains the solution with different numbers. I was just wondering why when finding the force on the wire instead of making dl= R*dtheta and going through the integration and separating the force into to components. Why isn't it possible to simply solve the equation for F=ILBsin90 with L= 2*pi*r/4?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 4.28.14 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 4.28.14 PM.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 579
  • Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 4.29.18 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 4.29.18 PM.png
    14.4 KB · Views: 584
Physics news on Phys.org
Mariah said:

Homework Statement


in the picture.

Homework Equations


F=ILcrossB
Along with the original question, the other picture contains the solution with different numbers. I was just wondering why when finding the force on the wire instead of making dl= R*dtheta and going through the integration and separating the force into to components. Why isn't it possible to simply solve the equation for F=ILBsin90 with L= 2*pi*r/4?
From what you've learned (using the right-hand rule), what is the direction of the differential force on each small section of the wire?
 
Mariah said:
F=ILcrossB
That equation is only for a straight L.
There are various ways to generalise it. E.g. if we take ##\vec I## and ##\vec B## as functions of position s along a wire then ##\vec F=\int\vec I\times\vec B.ds##. Or we could take current as a scalar I and make the path element the vector: ##\vec F=\int I \vec {ds}\times\vec B##. Same result.
Since the path changes direction, this cannot be reduced to ##IL\times B##.