Dirtyhand
- 1
- 0
It says that every reaction there is a opposite and equal reaction. Why do things still move if everything is opposite and equal?
The discussion revolves around the apparent contradiction in Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Participants explore why objects can still move despite this principle, focusing on the independence of objects and the application of forces in different contexts.
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of Newton's laws, particularly regarding the independence of objects and the nature of forces. There is no consensus reached on the initial question posed.
Some assumptions about the interaction of forces and the definitions of the laws of motion may not be fully articulated, leading to potential misunderstandings in the discussion.
Dirtyhand said:It says that every reaction there is a opposite and equal reaction. Why do things still move if everything is opposite and equal?
Dirtyhand said:It says that every reaction there is a opposite and equal reaction. Why do things still move if everything is opposite and equal?