Why do people call each other names?

  • Thread starter Thread starter laminatedevildoll
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why individuals engage in name-calling and derogatory remarks in online forums, particularly when opinions clash. Participants explore psychological, social, and emotional motivations behind such behavior, touching on themes of immaturity, frustration, and the dynamics of interpersonal relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that name-calling may stem from repressed sexual frustration, referencing Freudian theories.
  • Others propose that immaturity is a primary reason for derogatory behavior in discussions.
  • A participant argues that name-calling can occur when individuals feel offended or threatened by conflicting opinions, serving as a defense mechanism.
  • Some express that name-calling is a way to avoid engaging with the actual arguments presented by others.
  • There are claims that individuals may resort to name-calling to assert dominance or express feelings of inferiority.
  • A participant mentions that in certain contexts, such as dangerous opinions, it may be necessary to challenge ideas more forcefully, though this does not necessarily involve name-calling.
  • Several contributions reflect on the absurdity of using numbers instead of names, highlighting the social function of names in communication.
  • Some participants humorously engage in banter about the nature of their interactions, suggesting a blend of playful and serious undertones in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the motivations behind name-calling, with no clear consensus reached. While some agree on certain psychological aspects, others introduce different interpretations and rationalizations, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to psychological theories and personal anecdotes, but lacks empirical evidence or structured argumentation to support the claims made. The interplay of humor and serious commentary also complicates the clarity of the arguments presented.

  • #31
Smurf said:
Well being the center of attention for all the world's major religions, and many minor ones, tends to create a certain "mystique" about ones self.
Also, it should be noted that power is sexy.
I see lithium carbonate in your future.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Smurf said:
And this dualistic bigotry is the reason man can't be trusted to control it's self. Geeze, I mean the last time I gave a man free will he went and invaded another sovereign nation. I have to admit the whole god thing was cute at first, but now I just think he's a dink.

In conclusion, handcuffs are better substitutes for whips.
 
  • #33
All this wantonness and depravity, I think it is too late for an alert. :frown:
 
  • #34
arildno said:
All this wantonness and depravity, I think it is too late for an alert. :frown:

I am not sure why this thread went off-topic in the first place.
 
  • #35
laminatedevildoll said:
At another forum, I see people calling each other names and degrading each other because their opinion clashes with another's. But generally, why do you think some people call each other names and say bad stuff in general just because someone said something that clashes with their ideas. Why don't they accept it as only an opinion and leave it at that?
Occasionally, having an "opinion" is, indeed, reflective of a personality flaw.
 
  • #36
arildno said:
Occasionally, having an "opinion" is, indeed, reflective of a personality flaw.

But doesn't having an opinion contribute to the diversity of ideas in that topic? As a result, for the fear of being dissed, I don't like to voice my opinions about any subject matter because I know that people will eventually find some flaw in them. And that's great because I am willing to listen to other people, about more of what they have to say. But, when their opinions are extremely biased, and I try to inform them of that, they get all rude and all up in my face.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
laminatedevildoll said:
But doesn't having an opinion contribute to the diversity of ideas in that topic?
Sure, it is quite probable that Nazis have novel points of view in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict...
 

Similar threads

Is me being selfish that bad if it helps people?
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
Need help from FUNNY people (creating a game for my students)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
It is not impolite and rude to judge people?
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Can Employee Refuse to Give Last Name?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
Understanding GDP and its practical meaning
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
How Do Our Brains Process Tasks Differently?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Defending Science Against Ongoing Threats: Why the Scientific Method Matters
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
You sports people: methods for qualifying (for darts, in this case)
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Are Scientists Being Excluded from Juries?
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
What Is the Fundamental Unit of CCD/CMOS Sensors Called?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K