Why Do Relativistic Particles Lose Energy Quickly?

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
I understand that slower particles will be subject to the electric fields of the material for longer and lose energy, but why should relativistic particles also lose energy quickly?

The only idea we have is that there is a lorentz contraction of the electric field, BUT why then would that influence the traversing particle more?

thanks for any ideas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quicker than what, slower particles? Why do you think they would do that?
As general as you wrote it here, this is not true. For most charged particles there is a minimum of energy loss per distance at relativistic speeds - slower particles lose much more energy, faster particles lose a bit more.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
mfb said:
Quicker than what, slower particles? Why do you think they would do that?
As general as you wrote it here, this is not true. For most charged particles there is a minimum of energy loss per distance at relativistic speeds - slower particles lose much more energy, faster particles lose a bit more.

Hm, as I understood it slow moving particles and relativistic particles lose energy more quickly than those inbetween those speeds. I was trying to understand why relativistic particles will lose energy more quickly than those at 'intermediate' speeds. If the field is lorenz contracted then would it see a more "concentrated" field?
 
The electrons see a more "concentrated" field from the fast particle in the Bethe formula, right.

The minimum is roughly at ##\gamma = 3## which is certainly in the relativistic region.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
mfb said:
The electrons see a more "concentrated" field from the fast particle in the Bethe formula, right.

The minimum is roughly at ##\gamma = 3## which is certainly in the relativistic region.

Great. Many thanks for the replies!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top