Why Do Some PCB Designers Use Soldered Fuses Instead of Fuse Holders?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jobrag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pcb
AI Thread Summary
Soldered fuses on PCBs are often preferred for safety reasons, as they prevent users from replacing blown fuses with larger ones, which can lead to dangerous situations. This design choice ensures that only knowledgeable individuals can replace the fuse, reducing the risk of fire hazards. Historical examples, such as early Ford vehicles, illustrate the effectiveness of built-in safety mechanisms over traditional fuses. Additionally, soldered fuses may simplify the assembly process for manufacturers. Ultimately, the use of soldered fuses reflects a commitment to safety and thoughtful design in electronics.
Jobrag
Messages
551
Reaction score
28
Any PCB designers, why oh why oh why do you inflict those (insert profanity) awful fuses that are soldered to the board, fuses in fuse holders make life so much easier.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've been frustrated by those myself.

Only reason i can think of is this -
in some circles the fix for a blowing fuse is to put in a bigger one. Ever heard the phrase "Put a penny behind the fuse" ? That has burned down a lot of homes.
The soldered in fuse assures that it will be replaced only by somebody who has at least an inkling of what he is doing.

I like designed-in safety. Henry Ford was a genius at such things - headlight circuits in early Fords were protected by thermal overloads that cycled as they heated and cooled, so a faulted wire to a headlight would cause them to cycle on and off allowing you to limp home. A fuse would have left you with no lights at all. My '53 Ford was so wired and i think it dates back to 1929 Model A.

Some 1980's Fords have a headlight fuse inside the dimmer switch, which assures that should the headlight circuit develop a short it'll get fixed by somebody with at least the competence to find it, instead of putting in a bigger fuse and setting the car afire.

I don't know how it's done today.

So the answer to your question might be the proverbial 'ounce of prevention'
or it might be simply saving a step in assembly.

When studying designs it is often fruitful to ask yourself "Why would a rational man have done this?"

old jim
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top